Oh, we'll do this shit clause by clause.You say the reason for you voting at all was that you didn't understand the Necronomicon one.
You then say you voted for the highest voted one, even though they're not the ones you would have prefered.
The words 'I just so didn't understand' link the two clauses together in the way that explicitly enforces a causal link. You did one because of the other. Welcome to the english language. I'll thank you for not trying to call me illogical for following the standard interpretation of your own syntax.
(You then say you voted for the highest voted one, even though they're not the ones you would have prefered.
The words 'I just so didn't understand' link the two clauses together in the way that explicitly enforces a causal link. You did one because of the other. Welcome to the english language. I'll thank you for not trying to call me illogical for following the standard interpretation of your own syntax.
Mu Dinofiddler,
Wed 16 May 2012, 23:14,
archived)
Now I've explained the basic grammar of your own sentence I take this opportunity to reaffirm that it was a dick move.
(
Mu Dinofiddler,
Wed 16 May 2012, 23:20,
archived)
I'm not going over the same ground.....It's just quite clear you're as incapable of understanding as you are of answering the questions that I have asked you that you just keep ignoring.
So I'll just let you have the last word :-)
(,
Wed 16 May 2012, 23:26,
archived)
So I'll just let you have the last word :-)
I just fucking answered your questions. I've just told you, in plain english WHY your statement says you voted for heaven because you didn't like the necronomicon.I have shown you where you say it's "because", it's the clause "I just so don't understand". You haven't put up any sort of coherent argument against this. Just saying I haven't explained it DOESN'T MAKE IT TRUE. I've explained it. Twice. I've answered the questions you say I'm ignoring. Twice. Shall I say it again? THE QUESTION HAS BEEN ANSWERED. TWICE.
( Mu Dinofiddler,
Wed 16 May 2012, 23:36,
archived)
You're bonkers and incoherent and just make stuff up.Like I said I'll let you have the last word :-)
(,
Wed 16 May 2012, 23:41,
archived)
What part of my answer was incoherent? Which part have I made up?It's not my fault you said something which proves you're a dick. It's not my fault you don't understand how clearly you've shown it.
Again you're attacking my character with nothing to back yourself up with.
(Again you're attacking my character with nothing to back yourself up with.
Mu Dinofiddler,
Wed 16 May 2012, 23:43,
archived)
I'm making perfect sense. I think I've deciphered the "Someone has shown it..."The "it" in the message you were replying to was "you're a dick", this statement refering to you, that is the invisable man.
This makes the sentence read as "Some has shown that [the invisable man] is a dick..." which, I'm sure, was not your intention.
You meant a more open "Someone has shown that they're a dick...".
Which would have implied that I [Mu], was being a dick.
You're really not very good at this English thing, are you? I'm having to fix your insults for you.
(This makes the sentence read as "Some has shown that [the invisable man] is a dick..." which, I'm sure, was not your intention.
You meant a more open "Someone has shown that they're a dick...".
Which would have implied that I [Mu], was being a dick.
You're really not very good at this English thing, are you? I'm having to fix your insults for you.
Mu Dinofiddler,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:04,
archived)
Oh in which case you definitely need to make more sense little train.
(
Mu Dinofiddler,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:19,
archived)
Also: trying to invalidate my argument by abitrarily saying I'm "imcapable" without any way of backing this up? That's a bit of a dick move.You're just a bit of a dick really.
( Mu Dinofiddler,
Wed 16 May 2012, 23:41,
archived)
I think reading down the thread proves your incapability to understand what has been written and asked and ignoredLike I said though, you have the last word on the subject :-)
(,
Wed 16 May 2012, 23:48,
archived)
You're repeating yourself without taking into account what I've actually said.I've answered your questions. You're being willfully blind. You really are a bit of a cockend.
( Mu Dinofiddler,
Wed 16 May 2012, 23:51,
archived)
I'v no need to take into acount anything you have actually said...being as I lost interest in it half an hour ago ;-)
(,
Wed 16 May 2012, 23:55,
archived)
Well the most apparent one at this moment is you, right now, asking me to reiterate a point I've made about a dozen times. You see, I back myself up when I call you a dick.
( Mu Dinofiddler,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:07,
archived)
I knew I should have got a flounce image ready.
FeralCatMan Unusual disease collector.,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:12,
archived)
Of course you are deary. Backed into a corner by your own ignorance you pull the "bail" chute.*slow handclap applause*
( Mu Dinofiddler,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:18,
archived)
You just seem to need to unendingly rant....So I thought I'd oblige...
(,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:25,
archived)
You seem to think that this in some way removes from the fact you're a bit of a dick.
(
Mu Dinofiddler,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:29,
archived)
If you insist.You make a dick move in the poll.
You try to deny your own reasons for doing so.
You try to make your own sentence mean something differrent.
You make baseless assertions that I'm imcoherent.
Once you realise you're backed into a corner you try and assert you were "helping me troll along" or some shit.
Frankly, you're a bit of a dick.
(You try to deny your own reasons for doing so.
You try to make your own sentence mean something differrent.
You make baseless assertions that I'm imcoherent.
Once you realise you're backed into a corner you try and assert you were "helping me troll along" or some shit.
Frankly, you're a bit of a dick.
Mu Dinofiddler,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:37,
archived)
I'm glad you enjoyed it. You're still an irreversible cockend.
(
Mu Dinofiddler,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:43,
archived)
Also, in case you haven't got this bit yet, I'm not trolling you. You are genuinely and have proven yourself to be, a bit of a dick.
( Mu Dinofiddler,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:22,
archived)
What anger would that be? I'm more pitying your inability to follow a simple argument or put together any form of coherent reply.That and you keep trying to assert that my accusation of you being a bit of a dick is flawed.
( Mu Dinofiddler,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:31,
archived)
I don't gereraly bother with coherant replies to someone that is just trolling
I'm not trolling. I'm genuinely concerned that you can't see that you're a bit of a dick.
(
Mu Dinofiddler,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:41,
archived)
I'm not sure who you're refering to. It'll take more than this bit of dick being willfully ignorant of his own status as a bit of a dick and generally carrying on being a bit of dick to make me flounce; the bit of a dick
(
Mu Dinofiddler,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:21,
archived)
Aw man shall I? I could decend into a screaming mess and then delete the whole thread.It's not as if I haven't adequately proven that he's a bit a dick.
( Mu Dinofiddler,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:26,
archived)
I think the moment has gone.... FeralCatMan Unusual disease collector.,
Thu 17 May 2012, 0:43,
archived)