oh he's still posting that shit? lol
Michael Ellis contributes nothing,
Wed 20 Jun 2012, 10:21,
archived)
YesAlso, to clarify my position, I also think that the whole of B3ta is NSFW and any boss would be justified in being quite upset that you were on it during worktime - which many of us obviously are. But if we focus on things that "could look like porn from a distance" then girls taking their bikini tops off probably passes as that at least as much as the Queen with her knockers out.
( boris the spider,
Wed 20 Jun 2012, 10:47,
archived)
^ & eye of the beholder, mayhapsatomic's wakeboarding cock boys were left well alone?
(
maggenspies mayhaps,
Wed 20 Jun 2012, 11:03,
archived)
hahayes, much of b3ta is nsfw. i think the common view is probably that if it's a cartoon it's not porn, although i don't believe anyone who runs b3ta can have failed to see a distressing amount of cartoon porn online
definitely eye of the beholder, really. i take the view that tits and cocks are porn, and i've had this picture called both nsfw and totally sfw: www2.b3ta.com/host/creative/43351/1174580664.jpg
in hindsight, probably nsfw
(definitely eye of the beholder, really. i take the view that tits and cocks are porn, and i've had this picture called both nsfw and totally sfw: www2.b3ta.com/host/creative/43351/1174580664.jpg
in hindsight, probably nsfw
boris the spider,
Wed 20 Jun 2012, 11:30,
archived)
the general rule is if it looks like real human nudity or sex then it should be linked/thumbnailedso people who want to look can and those who don't, don't have to.
(
God - smiting mortals since 4004 BC,
Wed 20 Jun 2012, 11:31,
archived)