b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10863153 (Thread)

# notice: She is not child.
He will not glad.
(, Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:59, archived)
# Yeah I'm pretty sure Gary Glitters defence was that he didn't know they were underage
(, Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:04, archived)
# To be fair some of those Vietnamese 13 year old girls
are easily mistaken for MILFS. But to balance it out, only those deprived of the gift of sight.
(, Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:42, archived)
# You think fictional child porn is acceptable.
We don't.

Your usual trick of bait and debate is tolerated by most, but a statement like that leaves no room for manoeuvre.
If you're still here by the end of the weekend, I'd be both surprised and disappointed in b3ta.
(, Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:18, archived)
# The b3ta line
no one knows where it is but you know when it's been crossed
(, Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:24, archived)
# It was crossed
for me way back when Micheal Ellis found the previous child porn from this user. But B3ta, for some reason, gave them another chance.
(, Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:28, archived)
# I'll be surprised if the mods allow this to continue
(, Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:36, archived)
# In their defence, it wasn't something they posted on b3ta, merely found elsewhere and linked to by someone else.
But any indifference I had towards Moggy evaporated in this statement:
www.b3ta.com/board/10863122

My opinion, (and I don't expect others to agree with it), is no more chances, no more naughty steps.
(, Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:49, archived)
# ^ This
(, Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:52, archived)
# It looks like someone has removed the link as well
To the ass burger squirrel, that is
(, Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:52, archived)
# I think a mod would have posted a [mod edit]
looks like moggy has clicked that links to child porn are not ok
(, Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:56, archived)
# He knew that anyway.
'I never forgive Micheal Ellis' was made into T-shirts for christsake. Moggy is either very brave as a troll, very stupid, or very ill.
(, Sat 13 Oct 2012, 15:10, archived)
# I think you could compete for "missing the point entirely" at a national level
I have not looked at the linked image given your reputation. From what I hear it looks like child pornography. It is illegal in this country for a very good reason.

Images of child pornography promote child abuse as it normalises it, giving predators more justification to abuse rather than seek help. Child pornography has an even more sinister element to it; the trivialisation of consent. Children cannot consent to these acts as they are not emotionally mature enough to understand the consequences of such actions and neither do they possess the knowledge and experience of the world to make a reasoned decision in this regard. This makes child pornography extremely dangerous in any context.

For these reasons, your "is not child" [sic] excuse is a complete load of bollocks. Quite frankly I'm appalled that I'm having to explain this to an adult.
(, Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:38, archived)
# a point well made
(, Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:44, archived)
# Well said.
(, Sat 13 Oct 2012, 21:15, archived)