'I will afflict Jimmy Savile in the bottom of hell.' (This pic For atomic)
( , Sat 13 Oct 2012, 12:30, archived)
( , Sat 13 Oct 2012, 12:30, archived)
This reminds me of that crazy lady who was here a few years ago
The one that pretended she had cancer
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 12:37,
archived)
I can't remember her name but she posted pictures that looked like this one but then it turned out they weren't hers
Pasanonic was her personal white knight
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 12:55,
archived)
hahaha
just wait till they get past number 10
They will likely have "attachments"
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:25,
archived)
They will likely have "attachments"
WHAT THE FUCK
I clicked the link and I've got to ask what the fuck is going on in that pic
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 12:56,
archived)
It is without a shadow of doubt
exactly the type of thing young Japanese girls draw. Yes sir.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:00,
archived)
no they are disease ridden vermin that should be killed on sight
and even if it is cute why turn it into something sexual
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:15,
archived)
fetch the pitchforks and torches
lets have an old fashion nonce fire
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:34,
archived)
so you will only draw underage girls labia? reporting this post too, you are sick, go kill yourself before you hurt a child
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:39,
archived)
I just draw cute girl. I never hurt children. You are stupid...
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:41,
archived)
you are making pictures of child abuse, thus supporting the abuse of children, i'm reporting this too, you sicken me
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:44,
archived)
yes they do, and that is not an excuse for you to make or distribute child porn images on this website, you are sick in the head
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:52,
archived)
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:54,
archived)
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
This is not child.
there's absolutely nothing stopping children from seeing this website
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:54,
archived)
it's nothing more than underage yiffing
and I would have thought that by now you would know the reaction that gets on here
this makes me think you are just a filthy yiffing troll
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:33,
archived)
this makes me think you are just a filthy yiffing troll
with an average life span of 13
it is never legal to fuck a squirrel
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:48,
archived)
I think you need to be at least 16.
Best you check first though.
MIND THE PISS :)
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:59,
archived)
MIND THE PISS :)
Because despite
the school uniform, the hairstyle and the young face, a tail and ears suggest it just MIGHT not be blatant child pornography.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:10,
archived)
So why
is she wearing a school uniform then? Flat shoes, white long socks and stripey tie over her pigtailed hair?
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:16,
archived)
This is not school wear.
This is the clerk of the burger shop clothes.
and, clean knee socks. :)
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:24,
archived)
and, clean knee socks. :)
More lies
The entire diameter conforms below the touching ashcan
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:33,
archived)
You are liar bad person
Why won't the equivalent debugger wolf a decided etymology?
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:46,
archived)
More lies you are unoriginal
The agenda charters the insect past the earliest cosmology
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:05,
archived)
I drew her. :(
Look! She is adult!!
zaftigbunnypress.deviantart.com/
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:11,
archived)
zaftigbunnypress.deviantart.com/
I'm not clicking any of your paedo links
The ranged prison speak the green muddle
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:15,
archived)
Really?
So if I go into Burger King in Japan, this is what they are wearing? With all the hot fat flying around, might at least a skirt not be appropriate?
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:28,
archived)
it is a image of child abuse, you are sick and need locking up to protect children
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:34,
archived)
i have no idea what you mean, you are clearly supporting this nonce, reporting your involvment too
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:54,
archived)
Let's just clear this up.
To you, fictional child porn is acceptable?
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:43,
archived)
This is not child. But fictional child porn is OK, I think.
The people have every propensity.
A thing solving them is it.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:49,
archived)
A thing solving them is it.
this is a uk based website, fictional child porn is illegal, i know in japan it is ok, but that is because it is a country that is an utter shower of nonce cunts, now fuck off
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:51,
archived)
this would be a really bad time to have to report b3tards to the filth for hosting kiddy porn
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:53,
archived)
if i was the owner of that hosting site i'd be worried about the stuff this nonce has in it's account
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:57,
archived)
k, I can't quite believe I just read that post
but I strongly suggest you fuck off and kill yourself now
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:52,
archived)
Thanks for clearing that up
Now everybody knows what you are about.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:53,
archived)
If you believe what you just said
you need locking away somewhere where the corridors are full of groans and belms and the not too far away screams of despair coming from your cell.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:58,
archived)
WRONG!
Everyone knows we're all LOVELY on /talk. Even the autisms over on QOTW say so.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 20:00,
archived)
Fictional child porn is not acceptable on this site and this country (UK.)
We're a very broad-minded bunch here but fictional child porn will never be welcome.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 18:20,
archived)
you are sick in the head, i'm reporting you to the authorities, i think we all should, this is child abuse
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:33,
archived)
What link? I must have missed something. o__o
edit: Seen it...liked it. XD
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 16:26,
archived)
the odd thing is
the expressions on all their faces fit the scene perfectly
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:10,
archived)
see, my philosophy has always been that if you don't like a piece of art then it's perfectly ok to take all your clothes off and spray bodily fluids over it
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:15,
archived)
It is and also
used knicker vending machines which is also art apparantly.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:53,
archived)
Haha
You and Moggy working together could be the new Gilbert and George.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:13,
archived)
A 1960's pop group.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Them_%28band%29
No need to thank me.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:29,
archived)
No need to thank me.
what is?
I like my females like I like my whiskey, aged 14 years and filled with coke.
And hope that is read as the joke that it is, unlike your postings which are clearly not jokes.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:12,
archived)
And hope that is read as the joke that it is, unlike your postings which are clearly not jokes.
someone say "this is child porn" ; x ; But This is not child. She is over 20 ages.
So I just say.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:17,
archived)
Yes. that is my opinion.
Too childish.
There are many stone heads!!
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:26,
archived)
There are many stone heads!!
so if i take a porn photo of a cock and photoshop a child into the photo holding the cock, that in your opinion is ok?
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:33,
archived)
I'd rather have a stone head
than spend my time fantasizing about fucking 12 year olds. And then drawing pictures of it.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:36,
archived)
And by stoneheads is he refering to those which people smuggle?
And specifically, children. For whatever reasons...
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:40,
archived)
I assumed
it meant literally heads made from stone, which mine mainly is, but there maybe other meanings.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:47,
archived)
yes, if I went to Easter Island I would make the moaist of the opportunity to see them
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 15:05,
archived)
Not 'shopped, a genuine publicity photo, for sale on a popular auction site right now.
( , Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:01, archived)
( , Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:01, archived)
fucking hell
if we can't persuade you to fuck off and stop blighting b3ta with this sick shit at least everyone can put you on ignore
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:28,
archived)
True dat
but if that ain't going to happen next best thing is we all make lots of pichurs and post over Dave as he usually fucks off when he's knocked down the board.
More pichurs = Win all round :)
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:40,
archived)
More pichurs = Win all round :)
Good habit to link that unsafe image.
If you had post your burger porn image on board,
your account would be removed.
/google translate-proof
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:29,
archived)
If you had post your burger porn image on board,
your account would be removed.
/google translate-proof
Also. When you write replies. Afterwards please use Google translate tool in "English to Japanese" direction also. If you do this it ensures that you have the correct word order. Otherwise we cannot understand you properly.
/google translate-proof
Right, that's all the help you're getting from me.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:37,
archived)
/google translate-proof
Right, that's all the help you're getting from me.
Hello Moggy you mentalism.
Are you going to show us your golden bum today?
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:40,
archived)
It's almost like she doesn't WANT a cult of internet weirdos worshipping her bottom :)
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:43,
archived)
i always wait until my squirrels are above the age of consent before i fuck them.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:41,
archived)
I got to admit mongy, there's time's when I'm glad that 90% of the pictures on /board are just red Xs for me.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:57,
archived)
Still on IE6 innit.
On the current page I can see (from the bottom) JJ's Slaine, MartyG's Savile Orange, 7's Repost of Propaganda Monkey's Elephant with chinese guitar, baldmonkey's Sid The Sexist silhouette animation and Paul P's Lilly Allen Fear.
Everything else is REDEX.
:D
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:23,
archived)
Everything else is REDEX.
:D
I'm hoping that that includes the story of it being some sort of ninja clan plot to take over Japan by suppressing the birthrate by turning all the males into nonces and all the females into fans of yiffing gayboys.
Except for the ones in the ninja clan, who aren't allowed internets.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:48,
archived)
Your first picture condemns Jimmy Savile.
Your second picture would probably please him immensely.
Inconsistencies need to be addressed.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:55,
archived)
Inconsistencies need to be addressed.
Yeah I'm pretty sure Gary Glitters defence was that he didn't know they were underage
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:04,
archived)
To be fair some of those Vietnamese 13 year old girls
are easily mistaken for MILFS. But to balance it out, only those deprived of the gift of sight.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:42,
archived)
You think fictional child porn is acceptable.
We don't.
Your usual trick of bait and debate is tolerated by most, but a statement like that leaves no room for manoeuvre.
If you're still here by the end of the weekend, I'd be both surprised and disappointed in b3ta.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:18,
archived)
Your usual trick of bait and debate is tolerated by most, but a statement like that leaves no room for manoeuvre.
If you're still here by the end of the weekend, I'd be both surprised and disappointed in b3ta.
The b3ta line
no one knows where it is but you know when it's been crossed
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:24,
archived)
It was crossed
for me way back when Micheal Ellis found the previous child porn from this user. But B3ta, for some reason, gave them another chance.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:28,
archived)
In their defence, it wasn't something they posted on b3ta, merely found elsewhere and linked to by someone else.
But any indifference I had towards Moggy evaporated in this statement:
www.b3ta.com/board/10863122
My opinion, (and I don't expect others to agree with it), is no more chances, no more naughty steps.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:49,
archived)
www.b3ta.com/board/10863122
My opinion, (and I don't expect others to agree with it), is no more chances, no more naughty steps.
It looks like someone has removed the link as well
To the ass burger squirrel, that is
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:52,
archived)
I think a mod would have posted a [mod edit]
looks like moggy has clicked that links to child porn are not ok
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:56,
archived)
He knew that anyway.
'I never forgive Micheal Ellis' was made into T-shirts for christsake. Moggy is either very brave as a troll, very stupid, or very ill.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 15:10,
archived)
I think you could compete for "missing the point entirely" at a national level
I have not looked at the linked image given your reputation. From what I hear it looks like child pornography. It is illegal in this country for a very good reason.
Images of child pornography promote child abuse as it normalises it, giving predators more justification to abuse rather than seek help. Child pornography has an even more sinister element to it; the trivialisation of consent. Children cannot consent to these acts as they are not emotionally mature enough to understand the consequences of such actions and neither do they possess the knowledge and experience of the world to make a reasoned decision in this regard. This makes child pornography extremely dangerous in any context.
For these reasons, your "is not child" [sic] excuse is a complete load of bollocks. Quite frankly I'm appalled that I'm having to explain this to an adult.
( ,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:38,
archived)
Images of child pornography promote child abuse as it normalises it, giving predators more justification to abuse rather than seek help. Child pornography has an even more sinister element to it; the trivialisation of consent. Children cannot consent to these acts as they are not emotionally mature enough to understand the consequences of such actions and neither do they possess the knowledge and experience of the world to make a reasoned decision in this regard. This makes child pornography extremely dangerous in any context.
For these reasons, your "is not child" [sic] excuse is a complete load of bollocks. Quite frankly I'm appalled that I'm having to explain this to an adult.