Might make it awkward if they ever need to claim on the insurance
Tribs 🦇 ↓ dn ʎɐʍ sᴉɥʇ ↓🦇,
Mon 11 Feb 2013, 15:36,
archived)
Why bother insuring anything irreplaceable?
Edit: I was up at the De Havilland museum the other day for work and we were talking about insurance. Apparently little of their stuff is insured. As the man said; "The place might burn down and we get a lot of money; but where do you go to buy a 1944 Mosquito bomber as a replacement?"
(Edit: I was up at the De Havilland museum the other day for work and we were talking about insurance. Apparently little of their stuff is insured. As the man said; "The place might burn down and we get a lot of money; but where do you go to buy a 1944 Mosquito bomber as a replacement?"
TheSundaeLunch I'm a fucking shrub, alright?,
Mon 11 Feb 2013, 16:07,
archived)
The masses of money they'd get might be some compensation, mind youThey could make a load of holograms of the cars, burn the place down and claim the money, then set up the holograms with big "Do not touch the cars, WE MEAN IT SERIOUSLY" signs around them. Who could tell the difference? Not I, not I.
(
boris the spider,
Mon 11 Feb 2013, 16:17,
archived)
Planes Boris,Planes. These don't come in six packs.
( TheSundaeLunch I'm a fucking shrub, alright?,
Mon 11 Feb 2013, 16:50,
archived)