b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 10949871 (Thread)

# Everyone's disqualified from that, shirley?
(, Mon 8 Apr 2013, 17:37, archived)
# Aye, but I was wondering how many of today's teens know much about her
I'm 31 and could only tell you the key moments of her time in office as it all took place before I turned 10.
so I don't know if people born in, say, 1994 would be able to hold a balanced discussion on her...
(, Mon 8 Apr 2013, 17:49, archived)
# yeah, go on, make me feel old
(, Mon 8 Apr 2013, 17:50, archived)
# they could if they´d discovered some phenomena called writing or speaking
whereupon information encoded into symbols called words can be deciphered, revealing data about the past that extends even more that 20 years back. You can find words in human speech, books, and even websites. It can allow you know something about an event you didnĀ“t even personally witness
(, Mon 8 Apr 2013, 17:58, archived)
# Yes, yes, yes
But would 'yer average teenager' have taken it upon themselves to learn about Thatcher,
i.e. if I'd asked a 17 year old yesterday what they thought about Mrs T, what response would I have got?
(, Mon 8 Apr 2013, 18:07, archived)
# Round my way you would have got chibbed.
(, Mon 8 Apr 2013, 18:09, archived)
# That Ken Clarke was a right c*nt back in the day
(, Mon 8 Apr 2013, 19:40, archived)
# I don't see what living through an experienece has to do with it
If you stopped a random person on the street and asked them to explain what caused the current recession you're likely to get little further than "bloody bankers innit?". In twenty years I'd far rather have a discussion with someone who has recently studied the recession in school/uni, even if they werne't born at the time, then that same person on the street - especially after time has entrenched the bias in their views and dimmed their memory.
(, Mon 8 Apr 2013, 18:17, archived)