Agree.Must make it worse for the victims when they deny it.
Double their sentence for lying.
(Double their sentence for lying.
edjogs Collared doves are shit.,
Thu 2 May 2013, 17:26,
archived)
I know but to me that behaviour makes it a worser crimein terms of increasing the damage to the victim (s).
( edjogs Collared doves are shit.,
Thu 2 May 2013, 17:37,
archived)
I suppose it's a kind of 'game theory'If he denies it, and then it turns out there's not enough evidence against him, he can walk out of court saying 'See? Told you I was innocent!'
Lying about it is a case of all to gain, nothing to lose. But yeah, he KNOWS he did it, and that's the worst thing
(Lying about it is a case of all to gain, nothing to lose. But yeah, he KNOWS he did it, and that's the worst thing
The Silent Channel is getting his recommended 5-a-day,
Thu 2 May 2013, 17:41,
archived)
hehehThey should all say "I *know* I did it, but you've got to *prove* it. And if you can't *prove* it then I didn't do it"
(
Mighty Nibus who dares gins | @nibus,
Thu 2 May 2013, 17:45,
archived)
There's a BBC3 gameshow in this...
(
The Silent Channel is getting his recommended 5-a-day,
Thu 2 May 2013, 17:54,
archived)
No good.All the hosts are banged up.
( edjogs Collared doves are shit.,
Thu 2 May 2013, 18:08,
archived)