Uh-oh ...62. Possession of prohibited images of children
(1)It is an offence for a person to be in possession of a prohibited image of a child.
(2)A prohibited image is an image which—
(a)is pornographic,
(b)falls within subsection (6), and
(c)is grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise of an obscene character.
(3)An image is “pornographic” if it is of such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal.
(6)An image falls within this subsection if it—
(a)is an image which focuses solely or principally on a child's genitals or anal region, or
(b)portrays any of the acts mentioned in subsection (7).
65. Meaning of “image” and “child”
(1)The following apply for the purposes of sections 62 to 64.
(2)“Image” includes—
(a)a moving or still image (produced by any means), or
(b)data (stored by any means) which is capable of conversion into an image within paragraph (a).
(6)Where an image shows a person the image is to be treated as an image of a child if—
(a)the impression conveyed by the image is that the person shown is a child, or
(b)the predominant impression conveyed is that the person shown is a child despite the fact that some of the physical characteristics shown are not those of a child.
(7)References to an image of a person include references to an image of an imaginary person.
(8)References to an image of a child include references to an image of an imaginary child.
((1)It is an offence for a person to be in possession of a prohibited image of a child.
(2)A prohibited image is an image which—
(a)is pornographic,
(b)falls within subsection (6), and
(c)is grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise of an obscene character.
(3)An image is “pornographic” if it is of such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal.
(6)An image falls within this subsection if it—
(a)is an image which focuses solely or principally on a child's genitals or anal region, or
(b)portrays any of the acts mentioned in subsection (7).
65. Meaning of “image” and “child”
(1)The following apply for the purposes of sections 62 to 64.
(2)“Image” includes—
(a)a moving or still image (produced by any means), or
(b)data (stored by any means) which is capable of conversion into an image within paragraph (a).
(6)Where an image shows a person the image is to be treated as an image of a child if—
(a)the impression conveyed by the image is that the person shown is a child, or
(b)the predominant impression conveyed is that the person shown is a child despite the fact that some of the physical characteristics shown are not those of a child.
(7)References to an image of a person include references to an image of an imaginary person.
(8)References to an image of a child include references to an image of an imaginary child.
Ghoti Fingers,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 22:35,
archived)
You haven't given us subsection (7)How am I meant to wank to this?
(
boris the spider,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 22:39,
archived)
I don't think that picture is a sub-section 7 image(7)Those acts are—
(a)the performance by a person of an act of intercourse or oral sex with or in the presence of a child;
(b)an act of masturbation by, of, involving or in the presence of a child;
(c)an act which involves penetration of the vagina or anus of a child with a part of a person's body or with anything else;
(d)an act of penetration, in the presence of a child, of the vagina or anus of a person with a part of a person's body or with anything else;
(e)the performance by a child of an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive or imaginary);
(f)the performance by a person of an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive or imaginary) in the presence of a child.
((a)the performance by a person of an act of intercourse or oral sex with or in the presence of a child;
(b)an act of masturbation by, of, involving or in the presence of a child;
(c)an act which involves penetration of the vagina or anus of a child with a part of a person's body or with anything else;
(d)an act of penetration, in the presence of a child, of the vagina or anus of a person with a part of a person's body or with anything else;
(e)the performance by a child of an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive or imaginary);
(f)the performance by a person of an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive or imaginary) in the presence of a child.
Ghoti Fingers,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 22:40,
archived)
7(f) is merely sick7(e) is beyond the call of duty
( boris the spider,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 23:23,
archived)
...with an imaginary animal.How do they know it's there.
(
FeralCatMan Unusual disease collector.,
Fri 30 Aug 2013, 0:57,
archived)
so according to 65/8fictional child porn is OK, I think. is in fact not ok
(
real i'm not happy 'til you're not happy,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 22:44,
archived)
But fictional tenticals are not real so not humanist
(
Paul_P http://www.Paul-hub.com,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 22:46,
archived)
You mean as in words, not pictures?Yep, that's all fine and dandy. Each case will be examined on its merits but it is extremely unlikely that any textual publication would be prosecuted (based on precedent).
( Ghoti Fingers,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 22:47,
archived)
no, i mean pretty much anything that a certain mentalist postsis not ok on the basis that it's fictional, I think XD
ok, I've not quite woken up yet, but having re read the sections, I think dave's work is covered by all of these.
except perhaps 65/8
(ok, I've not quite woken up yet, but having re read the sections, I think dave's work is covered by all of these.
except perhaps 65/8
real i'm not happy 'til you're not happy,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 23:09,
archived)
I think you're mis-reading 65/8Specifically if an image of an imaginary child is found to be "child porn" then it will be treated in exactly the same way as an image of a real child.
So some of Dave's work (which thankfully I haven't seen, but have heard mentioned) probably is covered under this act.
So everyone who browsed this site and has one of his images in there cache should be mildly concerned.
(So some of Dave's work (which thankfully I haven't seen, but have heard mentioned) probably is covered under this act.
So everyone who browsed this site and has one of his images in there cache should be mildly concerned.
Ghoti Fingers,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 23:20,
archived)
Eeeenteresting.So every shitty TV crime drama with a paedo scene is in fact illegal? That should clear the schedules.
(
Colonel Boris "...a desperate Buzzfeed imitation...",
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 22:57,
archived)