
The point is what exactly is Twitter's objective in doing so?
( ,
Wed 22 Jul 2020, 21:27,
archived)

Twitter plays such a big role in so much harmful shit nowadays, and people are increasingly aware that it is by-design.
If they actually cared, they'd remove the addiction aspects. But banning a few QAnon cunts makes it look to the advertisers that they are doing something about a problem they caused in the first place.
( ,
Wed 22 Jul 2020, 21:49,
archived)
If they actually cared, they'd remove the addiction aspects. But banning a few QAnon cunts makes it look to the advertisers that they are doing something about a problem they caused in the first place.

they did such a great job taking down the Scientologists.
( ,
Wed 22 Jul 2020, 23:28,
archived)

would try and correct that to awooga.
( ,
Wed 22 Jul 2020, 23:31,
archived)

There are far right social media platforms for people who want them. Twitter is under no obligation to host anyone. ROAR, innit.
( ,
Wed 22 Jul 2020, 22:47,
archived)

( ,
Thu 23 Jul 2020, 1:20,
archived)

Literally once and then my work there was done.
I've never seen the appeal in social media.
( ,
Thu 23 Jul 2020, 2:19,
archived)
I've never seen the appeal in social media.