b3ta.com board

Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 1481378 (Thread)

Are you sure its your note?

Ive seen that already today, cant remember where though.

(

feckless the pirate, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:11, archived)

newsleter...

(

?, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:11, archived)

correct

wish i hadnt trawled through my history now.

(

feckless the pirate, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:14, archived)

Our survey says:

888888b.            888 888          888      d8b 888        
888  "88b           888 888          888      Y8P 888        
888  .88P           888 888          888          888        
8888888K.  888  888 888 888 .d8888b  88888b.  888 888888     
888  "Y88b 888  888 888 888 88K      888 "88b 888 888        
888    888 888  888 888 888 "Y8888b. 888  888 888 888        
888   d88P Y88b 888 888 888      X88 888  888 888 Y88b.  d8b 
8888888P"   "Y88888 888 888  88888P' 888  888 888  "Y888 Y8P

(

?!, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:16, archived)

oi tedious

new tune in messenger linkys

(

Reverend Dan, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:17, archived)

I've heard it, but alas,

never having heard either of the original records, I can't really enjoy it to the MAX.

(

?!, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:18, archived)

really?

blimey.

i could believe people hadn't heard hinterland by AIM but britney's slave 4 u? blimey.

(

Reverend Dan, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:20, archived)

Never wanted to hear it

and strangely enough, never have. Just lucky, I guess.

(

?!, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:21, archived)

that is cool

(i am me and various other people, Fri 4 Jul 2003, 16:47, archived)

yep

i seen that before too - small world i guess ;)

(Marvellous (mb) Mark, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:12, archived)

It was in

the newsletter.

(

wayward., Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:14, archived)

yeh i am

i posted it around quakenet a few days ago and only just put it on here :)

(olli holliday, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:14, archived)

But then why is there a version in the newsletter

on a different server and without the watermark?

(

?!, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:17, archived)

Hehe

Busted

(

wayward., Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:19, archived)

And there was no reply...!

I'm getting far too much amusement out of this.

(

?!, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:22, archived)

If you're wanking in the shower

wouldn't you have the water running? And how did the offended person determine that it was spunk and not hair conditioner? Did s/he smell it?

(BigKGChicago, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:43, archived)

The whole thing is quite clearly bull

but it was amusing bull until this arsemangling twummockscratcher came along and make it into even more amusing bull.

(

?!, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:46, archived)

but...

you'll notice hte picture i just posted on here is actually larger than the cropped + UN-watermarked version i posted before (the one in the newsletter). and the new one is a 300k jpg pretty much straight from my camera. the other was a 50k (85% compressed) jpg to save my adsl bandwidth.

unless i have real photoshopping-fridges skillz i think that proves it.

faggot :)

(olli holliday, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:25, archived)

yeah but the thing is

it was in the newsletter so a possible 60000 people saw it yesterday. masturbate into something else, then take a photo when you get caught.

(

Reverend Dan, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:27, archived)

I liked my reply better.

(

?!, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:29, archived)

me too

(

Reverend Dan, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:32, archived)

I'm terribly sorry, you appear to be talking out of your arse.

1) You can't spell.
2) Your shift key is broken.
3) The original image in the newsletter is larger in pixel size. [Edit: correction, no it's not - just looks that way.]
4) Crappy compression means yours is larger in file size. [This point, however, still stands.]
5) In conclusion, you are an arse.

(

?!, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:29, archived)

oh be quiet

if you can really be bothered, actually read and consider my post.

the newsletter + all other mirrors are CROPPED versions of the original. unless i somehow drew on extra bits of the fridge for my post....

the newsletter was also smaller in file-size because it was more compressed. ie. less detail. did i also enhance it?

no more please

(olli holliday, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:34, archived)

No it doesn't.

(Newsletter linky is here) - they're exactly the same.

LIAR, LIAR, PANTS ON FIRE!

"no more please"! Pfft! As if.

(

?!, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:37, archived)

but the pic you just posted

and the one in the newsletter are exactly the same

(lampoon now lives in new zealand, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:37, archived)

Just admit defeat

You big lying bastard, you.

(

wayward., Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:39, archived)

COCK OFF

You talentless spunkmonkey... If wanking in the shower amounts to the total of your talent, then you've no place here.

Do some work of your own and then maybe people will be nice to you Herr FlangeBasket

(

Predatory Sock has 99 dead baboons, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:39, archived)

It's a bigger file size

but the dimensions are exactly the same

(

wayward., Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:32, archived)

(No they're not -

the one in the newsletter is huuuuuge)

(

?!, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:33, archived)

I think there's a width tag in there

If you copy and paste the url, this one's huuuuuge too.

(

wayward., Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:37, archived)

So it is.

However, considering he claimed that the newsletter one was a cropped version of his, and it clearly isn't, the point is moot.

(

?!, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:38, archived)

heh

ok yeah i got that bit wrong

must have cropped it after it was mirrored. (i was trying to save my bandwidth while it was on my local machine before i uploaded it to my host (with watermark :))

the compression is still a valid point tho. so i'm not a "liar". so there.

(olli holliday, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:43, archived)

Yeah y'are.

Take us another picture of it then

(

wayward., Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:47, archived)

ooh yes

take another picture of it from a different angle. then we will know you're not lying and love you forever

(lampoon now lives in new zealand, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:50, archived)

What the fuck are you on about?

You fucking twunt

(

Predatory Sock has 99 dead baboons, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:47, archived)

Sure.

We believe you.
Thousands wouldn't.

Let's see a picture of the fridge without the note, hm? Or a different picture of the note? Oh, and to make sure it's not photoshopped, let's have those letters rearranged into "b3ta" - you have the 3, t, and a; I'm sure you have a b as well.

Make sure that letter in the background's there, too.

(

?!, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:48, archived)

Erm -- ee-whoops.

What do you know. He did! www.b3ta.com/board/1481698 . Apologies given!

(

?!, Sun 29 Jun 2003, 0:09, archived)

There we are...

take another picture to those specifications and i shall PUBLICALLY APOLOGISE to you...

And if you can't do this, i'm sure everyone here will call you a cunt

(

Predatory Sock has 99 dead baboons, Sat 28 Jun 2003, 23:50, archived)