fair enoughbut when i posted it i had no idea you'd seen it. i'd only had about 5k hits off my local machine cos it'd been mirrored so i had no reason to believe i'd be accused of a fraud :)
my argument *was* fundamentally flawed tho, as the watermarked one was the same one that was mirrored (but i didn't think it was)
good flame war tho :-)
(,
Sun 29 Jun 2003, 0:11,
archived)
my argument *was* fundamentally flawed tho, as the watermarked one was the same one that was mirrored (but i didn't think it was)
good flame war tho :-)
I have a feelingthat this one could go down in history.
The odd thing is that it was in the latest newsletter from here on Friday, b3ta.com/newsletter/issue94/ , so about 60,000 have seen the unwatermarked one.
So when a new user comes in and says it's theirs...!
Nice to know we're both laughing about it, though. Could have turned nasty, that.
(The odd thing is that it was in the latest newsletter from here on Friday, b3ta.com/newsletter/issue94/ , so about 60,000 have seen the unwatermarked one.
So when a new user comes in and says it's theirs...!
Nice to know we're both laughing about it, though. Could have turned nasty, that.
?!,
Sun 29 Jun 2003, 0:13,
archived)
Lets all...
...just be friends and share sweets with each other.
Mystery_Bob,
Sun 29 Jun 2003, 0:21,
archived)
i have a feelingthat that's the best picture i've ever seen!
oh wait - i thought he was wearing a party hat - that would be better.
(oh wait - i thought he was wearing a party hat - that would be better.
freshlegs,
Sun 29 Jun 2003, 0:25,
archived)
ha ha ha......yes - I can see how you would think that.
;)
(;)
Mystery_Bob,
Sun 29 Jun 2003, 0:30,
archived)
damn, I thoughtthere was party-hattage going on too, but the pic is still woo :)
( witchy is covered in BEES,
Sun 29 Jun 2003, 0:36,
archived)