' He had every right to defend himself by any means.'
utter, utter shit.
( ,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:16,
archived)
you're talking like i haven't had people break into my house
and threaten my with a meat cleaver.
( ,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:19,
archived)
and you still want these fuckers to live?
still, to each his own eh?
( ,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:20,
archived)
have them caught and sentenced to a prison term/fine/rehabilitation
just because the law is shit doesn't mean we should resort to vigilanteeism.
( ,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:34,
archived)
fair enough
if you want your home, and property violated, that`s fine - can we have a system whereby people who don`t mind have green sticker on their door, and people who would do something about the fuckers have a blue sticker? that`d suit me fine
( ,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:42,
archived)
because he had a right to use
reasonable force; murder isn't very reasonable.
( ,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:21,
archived)
what
about shooting him in the arse, so he`d remember it as long as he lived?
( ,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:30,
archived)
oh for fucks sake, thats not what i meant and you know it.
you're just being argumentative now. any means within the constrains of that situation. If that involves taking a life to avoid the loss of his own, then so be it.
( ,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:25,
archived)
people have been beaten to death by attackers
using only their bare hands before now, so dont try to be so /pedantic.
( ,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:39,
archived)
i think
the person who's defending themselves has more right to live. Providing the person was actually trying to kill them.
( ,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:32,
archived)
no no no NO NO NO NO NO
every single person has the inalible right to life. you can't have more of a right to live than someone else.
( ,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:36,
archived)
everyone
has the right to life. But if a person tries to take someone else's life, then that person is quite justified to stop their attacker, if necessary by taking their life. In my opinion.
( ,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:38,
archived)
ah!
but everybody has the right to life and the right to live! that`s the whole point - I`m never going to lock myself inside my house, with bars on the doors in case some wee cunt decides he likes the look of my telly
( ,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:44,
archived)
Because.....?
Has a life that will do nothing but deliberately degrade the quality most other lives that they come into contact with got any value?
Surely you throw the rotten apple out of the barrel of life in order to preserve others?
Or does that rotten apple have the right to destroy or otherwise lessen the quality of every apple that it comes into contact with? If it's very existence is a cancer on society, get rid of it.
( ,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:48,
archived)
Surely you throw the rotten apple out of the barrel of life in order to preserve others?
Or does that rotten apple have the right to destroy or otherwise lessen the quality of every apple that it comes into contact with? If it's very existence is a cancer on society, get rid of it.
when you come up to edinburgh...
we can send you out to Sighthill, one of the cities more glamourous areas, for an evening. We'll see how long your commie pinkass liberal opinons last out there...;)
/joke
( ,
Mon 4 Aug 2003, 0:22,
archived)
/joke