What a shame
It's not exactly unlikely that you could survive without food for 44 days, is it? Especially not as he's blatantly plumped up for the occasion.
What about calls of nature?
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2003, 13:38,
archived)
What about calls of nature?
Hmm..
You can survive 44 days, but you wont be healthy. Your kidneys get all annoyed at you and start to protest.
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2003, 13:41,
archived)
The republican hungerstrikers
all survived longer than that. And I'm sure the prison food they were on before that wasn't exactly healthy.. He's just not trying hard enought to die is he.
clicky
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2003, 13:54,
archived)
clicky
Damn..
If we shout load enough for an encore do you think he'll try it for 66 days?
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2003, 13:57,
archived)