my opinion:first one, enjoyable, over rated.
second one, shit.
third one, probably won't go to see.
(second one, shit.
third one, probably won't go to see.
Sir Sand GOBLIN ^popular page dis,
Sun 12 Oct 2003, 23:42,
archived)
that is almost exactly what i saidand Lazygamer went mental and started abusing me... it was well funny :)
(
popt_art,
Sun 12 Oct 2003, 23:45,
archived)
i'll remember to tell him what i thinknext time he's around.
( Sir Sand GOBLIN ^popular page dis,
Sun 12 Oct 2003, 23:49,
archived)
hehe*hands over a jolly big wooden sp00n*
good for shit stirring :)
(good for shit stirring :)
popt_art,
Sun 12 Oct 2003, 23:51,
archived)
mine:ficrt one: had two good fiught scenes, totalling maybe one-eighteenth of the film, the rest of which was guff.
second one: had nothing in it that was any good aprt from one good line by a Frenchman. shite plot, shite acting. i could cope with that if it wasn't for all the pseudo-intellectual ideas spread through it, which are to philosophy what Westlife are to rock and roll. huge pile of wank.
(second one: had nothing in it that was any good aprt from one good line by a Frenchman. shite plot, shite acting. i could cope with that if it wasn't for all the pseudo-intellectual ideas spread through it, which are to philosophy what Westlife are to rock and roll. huge pile of wank.
mikeisbrill,
Sun 12 Oct 2003, 23:45,
archived)