b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » What should be on the cover of The Face? » Message 2186202

[challenge entry] I propose a merger................................

because basically there all the fucking same...

From the What should be on the cover of The Face? challenge. See all 434 entries (closed)

(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:25, archived)
# if you don't like them,
you don't have to read them, you know.
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:27, archived)
# you do
it's the law y'know

you must read them
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:30, archived)
# Ha ha ha
Woo!
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:27, archived)
# what would it be called
the loadedmaxgaylifespectimehellocosnewselleplayspecfhm ?
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:27, archived)
# why is Q magazine the best named magazine ever?
The name is so short that the logo can be printed HUGE.

Not funny - but I like this fact.
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:29, archived)
# Although Q-TV
has turned in to the Hip-Hop Channel. Hmph.
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:31, archived)
# public phone voting
proved stonger than the brand I think
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:33, archived)
# DAMN THE PUBLIC!
Their all cnuts.

I know someone called Knut.
I find it hard not to giggle.
100% of FACT.
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:37, archived)
# I like the
smash hits charts, a truly unbiased chart, a record can be number one without having sold a record
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:37, archived)
# it's
a good fact
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:31, archived)
# wasn't it Douglas Adams
that wrote about novelists needing forenames that are longer than their surnames, so they print properly on book covers?
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:31, archived)
# I'd be fucked then

R O B
M A N U E L
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:34, archived)
# another promising career
dashed by typesetting
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:37, archived)
# robert + middle initial?
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:38, archived)
# hmm

R O B E R T D
M A N U E L
Yay. I am an author.
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:40, archived)
# nah, it would be condensed down to
NCG
(Naked Celebrity Gossip)
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:29, archived)
# must have took a while?
...
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:28, archived)
# nope.the egg timers still running....
(, Tue 21 Oct 2003, 21:30, archived)