

At least ours doesn't work so we'll never know

trips to Mars ended in miserable failure too, we needn't feel too bad!
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 11:40,
archived)

to know ours doesn't work and feel proud of it
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 11:43,
archived)

but the budget for their one lander was greater than for our entire space programme, including that musem near leicester
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 11:44,
archived)

all the pictures they're getting now are just 'shopped from the viking stuff and the 1997 stuff. so nyer.
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 11:48,
archived)

presumably a significant part of the cost of any space probe is the fact that all the parts are one-off.
Why don't ESA/NASA just build 5 of each probe, and then test one on Earth, one on the Moon, and fix any problems, and then send the last three to Mars...
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 12:03,
archived)
Why don't ESA/NASA just build 5 of each probe, and then test one on Earth, one on the Moon, and fix any problems, and then send the last three to Mars...

notice that those pictures require 1950's '3d glasses'?
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 11:40,
archived)

If they were flat, all the beer would fall out.
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 11:42,
archived)

Maybe someone should invent 4D glasses...
Contains not only the beer, but also the time needed to drink it.
( ,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 11:45,
archived)
Contains not only the beer, but also the time needed to drink it.