b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 2630687 (Thread)

# You mean I fit your stereotype of a feminist
when all I did was state the truth as it is perhaps using generalisations which I fully realise do not emcompass all of the male gender but work well within context of a fucking joke, dear.
(, Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:07, archived)
# That is such a puny excuse it's not even worth a considered response. 'State the truth'? 'Within the context of a joke'? Do us a favour.
As for the 'stereotype of a feminist', it's hardly stereotyping, is it? Feminists are a group of people unified by certain traits. Traits that you have exhibited above. You don't get feminists who break the mould by respecting men and accepting gender roles, do you? Incidentally, ending your posts with 'love' and 'dear' doesn't help your case.
(, Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:14, archived)
# Look, men are aboslutley fucking useless
and women are just as bad. What more needs to be said?
(, Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:19, archived)
# Fuck off and rape a goat
you have either have too much testosterone or not enough but you are severely imbalanced as a person who can only see his point of view.
(, Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:20, archived)
# I'M imbalanced?
Jesus Jumping Christ.
(, Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:24, archived)
# Yes imbalanced
you state my point better than I could ever have done.

BTW I ended my previous messages love and dear to illustrate that I can patronise you as well as you think you can patronise me and as for your stereotype of a feminist it is flawed as I'm not a feminist as I think I stated about 3 times before. If you can't take your leg being pulled the fuck off, because it was you who started by generalising about the whole of female behaviour - so one good kick up the arse deserves another in my book
(, Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:26, archived)
# Well, that was all very refreshing.
It's been years since I've tried arguing a point of rhetoric with a twelve-year-old. Excellent simulation. Well done.

(click)
(, Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:29, archived)
# Hahaha
12 year old? Great follow up - shit for brains
\edit shall I type (click) to pretend that I'm ignoring you.
(, Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:33, archived)
#
QED

edit: Yes, please do. Then I can fling childish insults at you when I think you can't see them and are therefore defenceless.
(, Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:35, archived)
# Pseudo-intellectual bullshit
get off your potty you're a "big boy" now.
(, Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:39, archived)
# Hint:
Calling somebody 'pseudo-intellectual' without justification has the tiniest chance of being accepted by those who aren't paying attention. But first you have to spell it right.
(, Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:41, archived)
# It is spelt right fuckwad!
and it was with full provocation caused by your anti-female attitude a right little can't-be-wrong aren't you.
(, Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:42, archived)
# ...
When there's only you and I even paying attention, editing a post doesn't fool anyone. And where did you get 'anti-female' from? Have you actually paid any attention to anything said so far? No, I give up. This is ridiculous. It's like talking to a broken Infocom game.
(, Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:45, archived)
# Whatever
(, Thu 15 Jan 2004, 12:50, archived)