Shit!
That is some ace work. I like the text as well. Well, I don't like what the text is infering, but I like it in the context of the picture.
( ,
Wed 18 Feb 2004, 14:08,
archived)
I'm never gonna use that font again
it reminds me too much of cock sucking clowns
edit: even if they DONT suck cock!
( ,
Wed 18 Feb 2004, 14:11,
archived)
edit: even if they DONT suck cock!
the text inferred nothing.
You made the inference, the text makes an implication.
dictionary.reference.com/search?q=infer&r=67
dictionary.reference.com/search?q=imply&r=67
( ,
Wed 18 Feb 2004, 14:15,
archived)
dictionary.reference.com/search?q=infer&r=67
dictionary.reference.com/search?q=imply&r=67
Wow
Proper pedantry, on a scale I have never seen before.
I've started to get worried every time I type something here, because I know there is always someone ready to pedant me.
( ,
Wed 18 Feb 2004, 14:18,
archived)
I've started to get worried every time I type something here, because I know there is always someone ready to pedant me.
"every time that i type"
/uberpedant about to be counter argued no doubt.
edit: and i think that the pedantry adds to the board especially if you are not particularly bothered about it.
( ,
Wed 18 Feb 2004, 14:20,
archived)
edit: and i think that the pedantry adds to the board especially if you are not particularly bothered about it.
There are very few who
back it up with links to reference materials. I have learnt the error of my way.
( ,
Wed 18 Feb 2004, 14:24,
archived)
heh!
Splendid. I try not to be too picky, but the difference between 'imply' and 'infer' seems to be confused frequently, and I decided not to let that one pass!
( ,
Wed 18 Feb 2004, 14:27,
archived)
quite right
However, he's wrong and pedantry is often backed up with references on this particular board of messages.
( ,
Wed 18 Feb 2004, 14:36,
archived)