b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 2849762 (Thread)

# Yeah I could take it out right now...
...but rules are rules.

I suppose I could introduce a new rule saying that any word with a blatant double or triple meaning is excluded...

edit: If anyone wants to list the words they think should be taken out in the forum over there I'd be much obliged. *doffs cap*
(, Mon 8 Mar 2004, 18:48, archived)
# Ideally, what you need is to separate words from their homographs.
Like with "content", you need to catch "am content", "is content", "be content", etc. and not "the content" or ">content<" (so's to avoid hyperlinks called "content"). Not perfect, but if done thoroughly it could be significantly more accurate.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2004, 18:56, archived)
# Now that's an idea...
...I just tried removing said 'ambiguous' words and to be honest you could go on all day arguing the toss. I think adding key words like 'am' to 'content' is the way forward.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2004, 18:58, archived)
# i'm certain
that the Blessed has to have been greatly enhanced by the Brian count
(, Mon 8 Mar 2004, 19:11, archived)
# Look out
for words prefixed by "not".
(, Mon 8 Mar 2004, 19:11, archived)