Could someone comment on the just the quality for me?Could someone comment on the just the quality for me? Thanks. JUST THE quality of the image. Not the joke... thing.
(,
Mon 19 Apr 2004, 20:45,
archived)
you used an appropriate font for the poo bit but because the image has clearly been saved as a jpeg several times the other writing hasgotten slightly distorted, try adding a little noise to the edges of the letters to simulate pegpoop
the tag is a bit bold for my tastes but then i don't tage the vast vast majority of my images
(the tag is a bit bold for my tastes but then i don't tage the vast vast majority of my images
lemony,
Mon 19 Apr 2004, 20:49,
archived)
Hmm. I agreeI agree with what you say and I *would* change the tag but im laaaaaaaaaazy...
(,
Mon 19 Apr 2004, 20:52,
archived)
Shit.The whole thing from top to bottom a big load of shit. Shit shit shit shit shit*
*Actually quite good, woo to you. Bastard.
(*Actually quite good, woo to you. Bastard.
Lazlo Woodbine Panowie!,
Mon 19 Apr 2004, 20:49,
archived)
the joke is the most important thing thoughthe pic quality is ok,all you have done is change text though. Things get more complicated when you start playing with the images. try it and we'll let you know :)
(
MrSanity has maybe kicked the WoW habit forever,
Mon 19 Apr 2004, 20:51,
archived)