
because everything can't be everything or it wouldn't include whats not everything
( ,
Sat 24 Apr 2004, 3:33,
archived)

godel did something with that didn't he?
( ,
Sat 24 Apr 2004, 3:37,
archived)

STUFF + NON-STUFF does_not_equal e v e r y t h i n g
( ,
Sat 24 Apr 2004, 3:59,
archived)

I think we just proved everything doesn't = E v e r y t h i n g. stupid words....
( ,
Sat 24 Apr 2004, 4:06,
archived)

yeah nothing is part of everything.
( ,
Sat 24 Apr 2004, 4:10,
archived)


I guess you need to define what "IS" is. :)
( ,
Sat 24 Apr 2004, 3:39,
archived)

and that isn't something.. or is it?
( ,
Sat 24 Apr 2004, 3:41,
archived)

If something is nothing then nothing has to be something.
I see no way to prove nothing is something. this conversation no longer servers any purpose.
( ,
Sat 24 Apr 2004, 3:43,
archived)
I see no way to prove nothing is something. this conversation no longer servers any purpose.

If something was nothing, then all this is nothing. which begs the question- if this is all nothing, what is something?
( ,
Sat 24 Apr 2004, 3:45,
archived)