ha ha ha haha ha ha ha *wakes everybody up in household* ha ha ha!
-edit- the blurry bits in your profile, are they just part of the background? had me fooled for a second!
(,
Thu 27 May 2004, 1:28,
archived)
-edit- the blurry bits in your profile, are they just part of the background? had me fooled for a second!
that is some rather lovelycss going on there, isn't it?
(
100% of Gibbon,
Thu 27 May 2004, 1:34,
archived)
oh dear god!a burberry profile, thats it, i have oficially seen it all!
(,
Thu 27 May 2004, 1:43,
archived)
well, almost all of itthere is still the "burberry profile with a badly drawn cock" that is sure to appear at some point in b3ta's future.
(,
Thu 27 May 2004, 1:45,
archived)
yes, just background images for thoseI did use alpha transparency filters at first but I couldn't make it degrade to something that still looked good in mozilla.
(,
Thu 27 May 2004, 1:39,
archived)
oh, i never bothered checking mine in other browsersi am pretty happy with mine though so i hope it looks good all round,
its a good idea drawing the sections on the background though, i had a hell of a time creating, resizing and moving boxes around, and you can use better effects the way you've done it aswell
hint of jealousy
(,
Thu 27 May 2004, 1:45,
archived)
its a good idea drawing the sections on the background though, i had a hell of a time creating, resizing and moving boxes around, and you can use better effects the way you've done it aswell
hint of jealousy
it has a few glitches in firefoxhalf the top bar text is missing and the white line to the left if your oookiezoo image doesn't show. Also the images aren't centralised in the blue borders.
It's probably because IE & Mozilla work differently if you specify both width and padding. IE's width/height includes the padding. Mozilla's doesn't.
(,
Thu 27 May 2004, 1:52,
archived)
It's probably because IE & Mozilla work differently if you specify both width and padding. IE's width/height includes the padding. Mozilla's doesn't.