might be worth watermarking the picture itself rather than just a tag.
(,
Tue 6 Jul 2004, 17:23,
archived)
Though I might do some self promotion... send them an email from a fake address saying 'Wow, check this site [link to site here]'. :P
(,
Tue 6 Jul 2004, 17:24,
archived)
They'll use them, or the lycos viral chart.
(,
Tue 6 Jul 2004, 17:28,
archived)
then nobody will use your picture at all - they'll just pic something simpler to use.
I would rather have my stuff printed without credit than not printed at all. Which has been the case so far.
(,
Tue 6 Jul 2004, 17:25,
archived)
I would rather have my stuff printed without credit than not printed at all. Which has been the case so far.
all pictures should be watermarked with a goatse - that'll stop those damn papers
(,
Tue 6 Jul 2004, 17:26,
archived)
nearly all of the people I know who have had a picture taken are quite chuffed about it.
I would be.
(,
Tue 6 Jul 2004, 17:28,
archived)
I would be.
I'd take it as conclusive proof that the media really are a bunch of fuckwits :)
(,
Tue 6 Jul 2004, 17:36,
archived)
with a few quid to say ta for the valuable commercial property & thanks for helping us make cash from your wit and sillyness
(,
Tue 6 Jul 2004, 17:34,
archived)
would you then seek out the owners of the source pics you used and offer to give them their fair share?
(,
Tue 6 Jul 2004, 17:38,
archived)