b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 3460731 (Thread)

# WTF?

(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 1:38, archived)
# ?
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 1:40, archived)
# I love you
always have.
You beautiful Lancaster student.
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 1:43, archived)
# and i'm lovin' it.
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 1:44, archived)
# lancaster university is for winners.
INCIDENTALLY

next summer term, anyone at Lancaster uni, or the nearby area needs to look out for RESERVOIR DOGS being put on through the Lancaster University Theatre Group (maybe at the sugarhouse) as yours truly is directing it.
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 1:51, archived)
# have you asked Quentin
for the rights?
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 1:52, archived)
# funnily enough,
we're in the process of doing that right now, and have been in contact with his PA for the last couple of weeks. There is a chance he may back it personally, depending on how a few things pan out. Its also going to be the first time its been put on stage in this Country.
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 1:54, archived)
# Tarantino in Lancaster Uni Theatre Group Shocker!
how hollywood!
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 1:55, archived)
# it would be pretty cool.
its doubtful he'll do it though. But I think we can get the rights to it easily enough.
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 1:57, archived)
# Oh dear
a student show again lacking any kind of originality!
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 1:54, archived)
# this one is just going to be cool.
plus, when you try and get "original", like turning it into an interpretive dance piece or some shit, it ends up being wanky and shite. I just want to put on a play thats violent, and stylish.
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 1:56, archived)
# how are you going to do the shooting, and the running
and the blood and the car chasing and remember all the words?
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 1:57, archived)
# shooting uses spot effects
running isny hard because of the size of the venue, there are no car chases, and some of the actors in the the theatre group are fucking incredible, some of whom get regular professional work, so that isnt a problem, and never has been.
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 1:59, archived)
# and sooooooooooooo
10 years ago
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 1:58, archived)
# as opposed to say, Antigone,
which is soooooooo 1000 years ago?
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 2:01, archived)
# but has sense of the now
with it's themes that are as relevent today as they were when it was first performed. Your choice of film adaptation is a badly written, originally poorly directed piece of sensational cinema that is easily forgotten and will not last the test of time.
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 2:12, archived)
# Thats only your opinion, which, of course, you are entitled to
Personally, however, I love it. As do many of the people who want to work on it. And at the end of the day, we aren't doing this to make some bold artistic statement, we're doing it for fun. We are still an amateur society, no-one involved gets paid any money, although we do have a much larger budget to work with than any other amateur dramatics society, owing to the fact that any money we make profit (usually anything between £100 - £500) goes straight back into the society and is used to budget the next terms plays. The film being ill conceived is completely irrelevant. We aren't looking to revolutionise the way people think about theatre, nor are we trying to deliver a piece that has some sort of moral or social commentary. We're looking to entertain people for 90 minutes. And I've picked a film that a large number of people find entertaining. I don't see a problem with that.
(, Thu 15 Jul 2004, 2:19, archived)