.
(
zog why change it now?,
Fri 20 Sep 2002, 18:18,
archived)
837A?
was that already there, or did you add it?
(
munkt0n,
Fri 20 Sep 2002, 18:21,
archived)
It's a watermark,
innit? Why not 8374?
(
helmetcream,
Fri 20 Sep 2002, 18:31,
archived)
well, cuz I was
already using the 4 as "for".
but I suppose I could.
thanks for the tip.
(
zog why change it now?,
Fri 20 Sep 2002, 18:42,
archived)
nice...
(
KD,
Fri 20 Sep 2002, 18:23,
archived)