1) She was an aid worker. Ken was a worker (for money).
2) Margaret lived in Iraq for 10 years. Ken went over there to make money....in a war zone..
3) Ken went over there, not only knowing the risks, but not giving a thought to his family who were rightfully devastated.
In conclusion, I make the distinction because Margaret was selfless. Ken was nearing the opposite of selfless, and yes it is a terrible thing that they both died but look at the facts - who had more control over their fate in the time leading up to their deaths?
(,
Wed 17 Nov 2004, 16:35,
archived)
2) Margaret lived in Iraq for 10 years. Ken went over there to make money....in a war zone..
3) Ken went over there, not only knowing the risks, but not giving a thought to his family who were rightfully devastated.
In conclusion, I make the distinction because Margaret was selfless. Ken was nearing the opposite of selfless, and yes it is a terrible thing that they both died but look at the facts - who had more control over their fate in the time leading up to their deaths?
Because I can find no reason to laugh at his death, or hers.
But I guess I must be inhumane, or just stupid. :)
(,
Wed 17 Nov 2004, 16:27,
archived)
But I guess I must be inhumane, or just stupid. :)
just so we could get his cunting brother out of the press
(,
Wed 17 Nov 2004, 16:29,
archived)
but I like these far less.
(,
Wed 17 Nov 2004, 16:36,
archived)