![Challenge Entry: Greetings Cards For Any Occasion [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
click (nsfw)
mod edit: sorry, it's a close call, but personally I think it's not safe for work
mod edit: sorry, it's a close call, but personally I think it's not safe for work
From the Greetings Cards For Any Occasion challenge. See all 489 entries (closed)
( , Sat 18 Dec 2004, 22:00, archived)

i.e. it is pr0n :D

otherwise you can clearly make out a naked woman preparing to take it up the dunger.
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 22:05,
archived)

the further away from your monitor you are.
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 22:03,
archived)

that to a boss on the other side of an office, it will look more like porn than to the person sat at the pc.
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 22:08,
archived)

and i got a lot of angry office types telling me off
so, id say that was NOT SAFE FOR WORK MOTHER watermelonER
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 22:02,
archived)
so, id say that was NOT SAFE FOR WORK MOTHER watermelonER

is this that c unting naughty word thing
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 22:07,
archived)

most of the board includes necrophilia, kiddy fiddling, jokes about dead people and tragic events in history, but one blurred naked woman and it's a no-no! Unbelievable
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 22:07,
archived)

Dead people, no pictures though....i guess
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 22:11,
archived)

what would draw a boss' attention from across an office. people are quite quick to spot flesh, but most other types of images tend not to draw so much attention - or if they do it's easier to explain them. and the thing is porn is a fairly definite no-no in contracts, whereas comedy pictures aren't
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 22:09,
archived)

I'm not sure if my picture is NSFW or not, how do I tell?
Just ask yourself, "Could this be mistaken for porn?" A suggestive picture of a lady in her underwear is probably NSFW even though there is no nudity, but a badly drawn picture of a spunking cock isn't NSFW (unless there is a fetish site for badly drawn, spunking cocks that nobody told us about).
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 22:10,
archived)
Just ask yourself, "Could this be mistaken for porn?" A suggestive picture of a lady in her underwear is probably NSFW even though there is no nudity, but a badly drawn picture of a spunking cock isn't NSFW (unless there is a fetish site for badly drawn, spunking cocks that nobody told us about).

porny pics are the big nasties for written warnings / sacking in work, and there are unfortunately people at work at the minute squizzing b3ta - plus people will spaz back
there`s very few rules here, but generally naughty pics have to be very subtle
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 22:10,
archived)
there`s very few rules here, but generally naughty pics have to be very subtle