It's allsubjective I suppose. I found it well written. I write myself and have read countless ( worthless really, ) books about creative structure. It does what it says on the cover and is exactly what it purports to be. If it claimed to be litererary genius I would have a differing opinion. I'ts a modern day whodunnit and cleverly set up IMO.
(
Zoot Cadillac . do androids dream of electric sheep?,
Wed 10 Aug 2005, 17:03,
archived)
the point is different people like different thingsfor example, some people liked Hitler. This book is a lot like Adolf Hitler. The people who like it are ultimately wrong.
(
Prof UnderCover evitable,
Wed 10 Aug 2005, 17:06,
archived)
^ThisHigh and mighty? Me?
(
Spunk Murphy Tchaikovsky is a synonym for fanny, apparently,
Wed 10 Aug 2005, 17:10,
archived)
But Hitler wasright about many things, he just did not have a sane enough mind to implement them. We would avoid mass over-population and disease if people would just accept that Eugenics is a natural form of evolution.
( Zoot Cadillac . do androids dream of electric sheep?,
Wed 10 Aug 2005, 17:12,
archived)
And with thatit is now officially beer o'clock
( Spunk Murphy Tchaikovsky is a synonym for fanny, apparently,
Wed 10 Aug 2005, 17:15,
archived)
