^ThisNorth Vancouver Bylaw 5981-11(i)
11.1 The Poundkeeper, where he has reason to believe that a dog, for which the licence fee for the current year has not been paid or which is not wearing a licence tag as herein provided or which has been seen running at large contrary to the provisions of this bylaw, has taken refuge on any premises, may seize such dog and may request the occupant of such premises to satisfy him that such licence fee has been paid and that the dog is wearing a licence tag, or to deliver such dog to him for impounding.
(11.1 The Poundkeeper, where he has reason to believe that a dog, for which the licence fee for the current year has not been paid or which is not wearing a licence tag as herein provided or which has been seen running at large contrary to the provisions of this bylaw, has taken refuge on any premises, may seize such dog and may request the occupant of such premises to satisfy him that such licence fee has been paid and that the dog is wearing a licence tag, or to deliver such dog to him for impounding.
Insane Maniac musically inclined (about 45°),
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:00,
archived)
Thanks for backing up my reply :)
Hagbard ... it's been a long time.,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:02,
archived)
Well yes, the facts are true, & I dont deny that you 'might' have taken itbut this is a viral pic, seen this before
( Insane Maniac musically inclined (about 45°),
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:07,
archived)
Not this picture. You've seen a different viral image of the same real-world item.I've got the original EXIF somewhere which will give time/date etc... (ie, about 3 1/2 weeks ago) if gonna accuse me of posting stuff that's not mine.
( Hagbard ... it's been a long time.,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:16,
archived)
I didn't say its not yours!!! Look up^^I'm just saying it's been round the web a couple of times!
( Insane Maniac musically inclined (about 45°),
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:17,
archived)
You said "this is a viral pic"No it's not. This image is mine and not the viral one you are talking about.
"I'm just saying it's been round the web a couple of times!"
And I am telling you that you're flat out 100% wrong. A very similar image of the same real world object may have been, but that's not the same thing.
("I'm just saying it's been round the web a couple of times!"
And I am telling you that you're flat out 100% wrong. A very similar image of the same real world object may have been, but that's not the same thing.
Hagbard ... it's been a long time.,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:20,
archived)
Ok, lemme get this straight:I'm in the wrong for accusing you of something that is actually yours, but I thought wasn't as I'd seen something similar before.
You're in the wrong for accusing me of assuming you didn't take it, when I made the mistake on the basis of a similar thing being a viral image.
Sod this, beer?
(You're in the wrong for accusing me of assuming you didn't take it, when I made the mistake on the basis of a similar thing being a viral image.
Sod this, beer?
Insane Maniac musically inclined (about 45°),
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:24,
archived)
There's no 'wrong' here, just a case of mistaken identity.Ohh .. mine's a pint of Badger "Golden Glory"
( Hagbard ... it's been a long time.,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:26,
archived)