![[challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif "Challenge Entry: If computer games were real"){kind=small}
Guess who?
From the If computer games were real challenge. See all 559 entries (closed)
(, Fri 26 Aug 2005, 13:46, archived)
Is that you mummy?
Insane Maniac musically inclined (about 45°),
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 13:49,
archived)
Wrong Jeremy?/don't geddit
(
Haku Orange Whip? Orange Whip? Three Orange Whips.,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 13:49,
archived)
If it's "Ron Jeremy 64" (a'la Mario 64)It's already been done.
TJ: Saw this sign in Canada:
(TJ: Saw this sign in Canada:
Hagbard ... it's been a long time.,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 13:51,
archived)
Arf! Nice one :)Edit: Needs another addition....
Guide Dogs: Look out for the big step!
(Guide Dogs: Look out for the big step!
nadey,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 13:52,
archived)
Yes, I didIt's totally unshopped.
( Hagbard ... it's been a long time.,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 13:54,
archived)
Thenyou saw it about four years ago and have been plugging it all over the internet ever since...
(
hypnochimp,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 13:56,
archived)
NopeSnapped it on about August 3rd. Obviously someone got there first though. In a place called 'Deep Cove' on the north shore of Vancouver.
( Hagbard ... it's been a long time.,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:00,
archived)
^ThisNorth Vancouver Bylaw 5981-11(i)
11.1 The Poundkeeper, where he has reason to believe that a dog, for which the licence fee for the current year has not been paid or which is not wearing a licence tag as herein provided or which has been seen running at large contrary to the provisions of this bylaw, has taken refuge on any premises, may seize such dog and may request the occupant of such premises to satisfy him that such licence fee has been paid and that the dog is wearing a licence tag, or to deliver such dog to him for impounding.
(11.1 The Poundkeeper, where he has reason to believe that a dog, for which the licence fee for the current year has not been paid or which is not wearing a licence tag as herein provided or which has been seen running at large contrary to the provisions of this bylaw, has taken refuge on any premises, may seize such dog and may request the occupant of such premises to satisfy him that such licence fee has been paid and that the dog is wearing a licence tag, or to deliver such dog to him for impounding.
Insane Maniac musically inclined (about 45°),
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:00,
archived)
Thanks for backing up my reply :) Hagbard ... it's been a long time.,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:02,
archived)
Well yes, the facts are true, & I dont deny that you 'might' have taken itbut this is a viral pic, seen this before
( Insane Maniac musically inclined (about 45°),
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:07,
archived)
Not this picture. You've seen a different viral image of the same real-world item.I've got the original EXIF somewhere which will give time/date etc... (ie, about 3 1/2 weeks ago) if gonna accuse me of posting stuff that's not mine.
( Hagbard ... it's been a long time.,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:16,
archived)
I didn't say its not yours!!! Look up^^I'm just saying it's been round the web a couple of times!
( Insane Maniac musically inclined (about 45°),
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:17,
archived)
You said "this is a viral pic"No it's not. This image is mine and not the viral one you are talking about.
"I'm just saying it's been round the web a couple of times!"
And I am telling you that you're flat out 100% wrong. A very similar image of the same real world object may have been, but that's not the same thing.
("I'm just saying it's been round the web a couple of times!"
And I am telling you that you're flat out 100% wrong. A very similar image of the same real world object may have been, but that's not the same thing.
Hagbard ... it's been a long time.,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:20,
archived)
Ok, lemme get this straight:I'm in the wrong for accusing you of something that is actually yours, but I thought wasn't as I'd seen something similar before.
You're in the wrong for accusing me of assuming you didn't take it, when I made the mistake on the basis of a similar thing being a viral image.
Sod this, beer?
(You're in the wrong for accusing me of assuming you didn't take it, when I made the mistake on the basis of a similar thing being a viral image.
Sod this, beer?
Insane Maniac musically inclined (about 45°),
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:24,
archived)
There's no 'wrong' here, just a case of mistaken identity.Ohh .. mine's a pint of Badger "Golden Glory"
( Hagbard ... it's been a long time.,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:26,
archived)
Much as I love a bit of pedanting,you both know what the other means.
Shush.
(,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:26,
archived)
Shush.
Bizarre.I guess a funny idea is a funny idea...
( Hagbard ... it's been a long time.,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:01,
archived)
the games world is totally messed upyou can run around and chop the shite out of people in games like GTA with full-on gore, but if you even hint of sex the parent brigade go up in arms
( Haku Orange Whip? Orange Whip? Three Orange Whips.,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 13:53,
archived)
That's because violence is a natural thing that has been around since the dawn of time,whereas sex is some stupidness dreamt up by hippies in the 60s.
The ability to kill will serve our young ones much better than any knowledge of procreation.
(,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:01,
archived)
The ability to kill will serve our young ones much better than any knowledge of procreation.
Ahhh! but those parents are all prudesprobably never had sex, they probably adopted their kids!
(,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 14:01,
archived)
Stusut79You are wise in the ways of the outdated video game stu. perhaps i will let you shag my sister after all.
(,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 13:54,
archived)
Thank you JinDodYou are truly gracious! However, I have no desire to commit such an act with your sister, for I am an uphill gardener. Thanks anyway!
(,
Fri 26 Aug 2005, 13:59,
archived)