ah well, i dont care if I thread jack then
/edit Damn that Rik and his infallible logic!
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 19:46,
archived)
/edit Damn that Rik and his infallible logic!
posted the source image, you cunt.
and it game me the feckin' 'orn.
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:08,
archived)
Flatter your worm?
My, my, let's slow this down a bit.
And I was joking, you know. Unless you really are a cunt?
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:18,
archived)
And I was joking, you know. Unless you really are a cunt?
I really am a cunt.
but I'm never a serious one ;) It's the hamtouching cunts you need to be aware of.
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:20,
archived)
Gah.
Can't find it now, it was posted in a text-only thread so there is the distinct possibility it was deleted.
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:29,
archived)
best jpg photographic stuff, unless it`s animated
use teh GIF for cartoony / line art pics with lots of solid colour
keeps the file size a lot smaller
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 19:51,
archived)
keeps the file size a lot smaller
pfft
MS paint don't allow for the best optimisation, y'know? and anyway, PNG is where it's at, man.
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:07,
archived)
haha PNG may very well be where it`s at
but the file sizes range from nice to what-the-hell? good idea in principle, just let down by the execution somewhat
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:09,
archived)
You're right.
I saw we all stick to BMP from now on. Or failing that, TIFF: best of all the formats.
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:15,
archived)
tiff really has been the best of all the formats
if you have been a camera blerk from the dawn of digital. RAW is where it's at now. As for optimisation? Gimp is free and if you have low morals so are all other programs. E-mail in profile for further advice on this tack.
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:18,
archived)
Sigh.
I really do know all this. I have both Photoshop and the Gimp installed, plus a nifty little thing called Paint.net, you might want to give it a look. It was just a quick case of painting a magenta cock onto a picture, for which MS Paint seemed the ideal solution.
And TIFF isn't really ideal for webpages.
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:24,
archived)
And TIFF isn't really ideal for webpages.
tiff is not at all suitable for anything but image editing
and if you put anything other than gif or jpeg here you will be bumraped.
If you have the tools then why argue about what is suitable? Just do as the faq asks. Sorry if I pissed you off. You need a thicker skin.
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:30,
archived)
If you have the tools then why argue about what is suitable? Just do as the faq asks. Sorry if I pissed you off. You need a thicker skin.