trying to figure out this slide show deal..does it work? which one is better
( , Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:33, archived)
( , Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:33, archived)
The last one.
But make the image a 'next' link too.
The flash one 'might' seem best, but I say 'Think of the spakkers, won't somebody please think of the spackers?'
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:34,
archived)
The flash one 'might' seem best, but I say 'Think of the spakkers, won't somebody please think of the spackers?'
Aye, but somehow it seems less bothersome if the loading is behind the scenes
after all, we're waiting for the same piccy's so it aint any longer really.
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:39,
archived)
You can preload html pages you know?
<link rel="prefetch" href="http://hamtoucher.com/index.php"><a href="http://hamtoucher.com/index.php">Hamtoucher</a>
Only can be used once per page, btw.
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:54,
archived)
Only can be used once per page, btw.
Ah, useful.
I don't tend to dabble in either Flash or html so go purely by what my eyeses tell me.
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 21:02,
archived)
The
<link rel="prefetch" href="http://hamtoucher.com/index.php"> bit can go anywhere, but I tend to put it before the relevant link as it help.
The page specified is loaded (in the background) as soon as all of the current page is loaded.
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 21:12,
archived)
The page specified is loaded (in the background) as soon as all of the current page is loaded.
Those photos are rather lovely
I like the first one, purely because it preloads and looks smoother. You could add some buttons maybe, or time it like the html ones.
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:35,
archived)
flash will never let you down
www.crosbymarina.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Pictures
my IT project...
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:37,
archived)
my IT project...
Except of course that Macromedia were bought out by Adobe at the start of last year?
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:38,
archived)
For how long though?
MX2004 will be the last Flash I reckon, the next thing will be a mix of video within a pdf format (which will be much like Flash) and soon enough people won't have the macromedia plug-in.
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 21:01,
archived)
either firestoat has gone bananas
or your server isn`t sending back the correct headers.. I`m not seeing the page, just the source code
edit: it`s not sending back the correct http response codes
( ,
Fri 6 Jan 2006, 20:43,
archived)
edit: it`s not sending back the correct http response codes