
geuine funny ones we can all have a laugh at in the contect that they are FUNNY, by endlessley repeating the same joke and swamping the boards with the same mohammed stuff, kinda makes the board look a bit racist and that it has 'issues',no?
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:10,
archived)

I like a good bandwagon, but they can trundle on just a little too long, especially when they can be seen as offensive.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:12,
archived)

people posting links to the BNP site, however inoffensive or funny the content of a particular page my be, I worry.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:13,
archived)

but in the context that its not endlessly repeated for the sake of it all as with this mohammed business. It generally tends to be funny in a genuine way.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:13,
archived)

How many have featured the Danish catoon thingy? I've seen some genuinely funny stuff not get FP'ed like the BANISH one yesterday. I think everyones had enough of it.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:12,
archived)

( , Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:14, archived)

as I said before, its not just shopping mohammeds representation onto a gay couple having sex, its not big and its not clever...
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:15,
archived)

but extremists are unlikely to see them within that context, are they?
Even a couple of the FP'd ones were mocking the Islamic belief that you shouldn't pictorially represent prophets or god. The one with the vegetable Mohammed at the end, for instance.
Not to say that I didn't laugh at it. Just making the point that many of them could be seen to be inflamatory.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:18,
archived)
Even a couple of the FP'd ones were mocking the Islamic belief that you shouldn't pictorially represent prophets or god. The one with the vegetable Mohammed at the end, for instance.
Not to say that I didn't laugh at it. Just making the point that many of them could be seen to be inflamatory.

extremism comes mainly from blind reactionism.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:30,
archived)