
memememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememe
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 14:57,
archived)

Oh well, guess I'll just spend this truckload of cash on something else.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:00,
archived)

My plans are foiled.
Tell you what, sponsor me a couple of quid and I'll put a couple of s in it.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:03,
archived)
Tell you what, sponsor me a couple of quid and I'll put a couple of s in it.

sadly I've got all of £2.20 to survive the next two days on.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:09,
archived)


I've got a whole fucking bagload of pinklines. Am I just being pissy today or is the board swamped with idiots?
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 14:58,
archived)

Right, today has been exceptionally bad for people not understanding simple GUIDELINES set
out for the good of all, basically, for those twunts who can't be bothered to read the entire
FAQ, heres a brief spoiler for you to pick out the juicy bits, remember these and you won't go far wrong..
Images - optimised to 50k or under if at all possible - please
Animations - Try and bring under 250k where you can, if you can't without serious degradation, please link to them - if they're good, we'll still comment
PORN - Just NOT acceptable for viewing anywhere, and anytime - so LINK it, don't SHOW it - and state on the link that its NSFW please
and all this mohammed business.
We've all SEEN it, READ it, DONE it to death 1001 times, and the joke is getting very thin
By swamping the board like this with such images using that cartoon, it aint gonna take long until someone outside of B3ta latches onto this and starts a scene - dont forget, the tabloids love this place for nicking images - and if the shit does hit the fan, it'll be Rob and mods who get it in the neck, they DON'T need the fucking hassle.
and one more thing
REPOSTS - if they're good, bung 'em in an EXISTING thread and link to 'em in a creative way, NEW THREADS ARE FOR NEW IMAGES/LINKS ETC
right - kettle and Tea
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:04,
archived)
out for the good of all, basically, for those twunts who can't be bothered to read the entire
FAQ, heres a brief spoiler for you to pick out the juicy bits, remember these and you won't go far wrong..
Images - optimised to 50k or under if at all possible - please
Animations - Try and bring under 250k where you can, if you can't without serious degradation, please link to them - if they're good, we'll still comment
PORN - Just NOT acceptable for viewing anywhere, and anytime - so LINK it, don't SHOW it - and state on the link that its NSFW please
and all this mohammed business.
We've all SEEN it, READ it, DONE it to death 1001 times, and the joke is getting very thin
By swamping the board like this with such images using that cartoon, it aint gonna take long until someone outside of B3ta latches onto this and starts a scene - dont forget, the tabloids love this place for nicking images - and if the shit does hit the fan, it'll be Rob and mods who get it in the neck, they DON'T need the fucking hassle.
and one more thing
REPOSTS - if they're good, bung 'em in an EXISTING thread and link to 'em in a creative way, NEW THREADS ARE FOR NEW IMAGES/LINKS ETC
right - kettle and Tea

*raises drink and quickly hides it 'cause he's in the college library*
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:06,
archived)

Not only did they block b3ta.com directly, they found out about my secret proxy and blocked that as well :(
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:40,
archived)

although if the mods were that concerned about causing a ruckus they probably wouldn't have FP'd the good ones.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:07,
archived)

that aint funny, thats just stupid, funny we can deal with, stupidity is just well, stupid
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:08,
archived)

innit? And they were reprinted in a different context to make a serious statement. Still caused trouble.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:13,
archived)

but if the Mods and Rob didn't want the hassle of teh Mohammed thing, then they wouldn't FP so many images that took the piss would they?
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:08,
archived)

geuine funny ones we can all have a laugh at in the contect that they are FUNNY, by endlessley repeating the same joke and swamping the boards with the same mohammed stuff, kinda makes the board look a bit racist and that it has 'issues',no?
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:10,
archived)

I like a good bandwagon, but they can trundle on just a little too long, especially when they can be seen as offensive.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:12,
archived)

people posting links to the BNP site, however inoffensive or funny the content of a particular page my be, I worry.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:13,
archived)

but in the context that its not endlessly repeated for the sake of it all as with this mohammed business. It generally tends to be funny in a genuine way.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:13,
archived)

How many have featured the Danish catoon thingy? I've seen some genuinely funny stuff not get FP'ed like the BANISH one yesterday. I think everyones had enough of it.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:12,
archived)

( , Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:14, archived)

as I said before, its not just shopping mohammeds representation onto a gay couple having sex, its not big and its not clever...
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:15,
archived)

but extremists are unlikely to see them within that context, are they?
Even a couple of the FP'd ones were mocking the Islamic belief that you shouldn't pictorially represent prophets or god. The one with the vegetable Mohammed at the end, for instance.
Not to say that I didn't laugh at it. Just making the point that many of them could be seen to be inflamatory.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:18,
archived)
Even a couple of the FP'd ones were mocking the Islamic belief that you shouldn't pictorially represent prophets or god. The one with the vegetable Mohammed at the end, for instance.
Not to say that I didn't laugh at it. Just making the point that many of them could be seen to be inflamatory.

extremism comes mainly from blind reactionism.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:30,
archived)

I think the real question is: is there really
a double standard?
I'm not absolutely convinced there isn't
(not here on b3ta but in the European press).

We don't want to all be detained without charge for inciting racial hatred now, do we?
... *all* of us - especially if we live in London. Can't be too careful these days!
/derants
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:44,
archived)
... *all* of us - especially if we live in London. Can't be too careful these days!
/derants

"The mr T. Experience"
The music was pretty lame but hey, with that name I don't care.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:10,
archived)
The music was pretty lame but hey, with that name I don't care.

I guess I did
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:12,
archived)


'specially the Mohammed thing, I can see it ending in tears... or possibly burnings.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:09,
archived)

this article is also of note about online attacks....
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4692518.stm
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:10,
archived)
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4692518.stm

i got to the third word and couldn't be bothered
to read anymore...
anyone for a mohammed joke?
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:16,
archived)
to read anymore...
anyone for a mohammed joke?

He's a bit nifty at the detecting lark.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:18,
archived)

shirley it was his lackies who did the detecting ;-)
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:19,
archived)

Raymond Burr did his fair share of poking about though, if the rumours are true.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:22,
archived)

well 3 if you count my japanese one...
but there are lots and lots of youmormons masons about!
it's a tough job, but i got my eye on you all!
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:33,
archived)
but there are lots and lots of you
it's a tough job, but i got my eye on you all!

i went out and bought a special "vest" the other day
and another lock for my front door....
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:20,
archived)
and another lock for my front door....

Hamtoucher.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:19,
archived)

if you read carefully. 200k is suggested, but up to 250k is fine
Hamtoucher
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:22,
archived)
Hamtoucher

Surely you watch and see what a board is like before deciding you want to join it?
At the very least you should have an idea of what is and isn't acceptable on it.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:24,
archived)
At the very least you should have an idea of what is and isn't acceptable on it.

y'see, the majority of people here are cool
I hope Im not coming across as TOO much of a nazi, but if the regular sensible users can stick to guidelines for peace and harmony, why cant everyone after having a brief scan of the faq?
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:26,
archived)
I hope Im not coming across as TOO much of a nazi, but if the regular sensible users can stick to guidelines for peace and harmony, why cant everyone after having a brief scan of the faq?

and its about 5mb. If they have been lurking on b3ta, you would have thought they would know the basic rules by now.
( ,
Wed 8 Feb 2006, 15:27,
archived)