b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 5658059 (Thread)

# so was Peppers,
but it went away eventually didn't it? no point BANNING people over it surely?
(, Tue 14 Feb 2006, 15:54, archived)
# I'm not going to argue with the mods on this one - it did my head in.
(, Tue 14 Feb 2006, 15:55, archived)
# fair enough,
but BANNING?

bit harsh?
(, Tue 14 Feb 2006, 16:01, archived)
# I agree instant banning is a bit harsh yes. IMO the thing to do would have been a warning message first.
And then if the person carried on regardless, then they may face a ban
(, Tue 14 Feb 2006, 16:03, archived)
# indeed,
this seems perfectly fair to me.
(, Tue 14 Feb 2006, 16:19, archived)
# yeah
and fire is pretty, peppers is not!
(, Tue 14 Feb 2006, 15:55, archived)
# were they at least warned by the mods anyway?
(, Tue 14 Feb 2006, 15:58, archived)
# what about the countless rik wagons and so on.
they'll end up banning everyone if their not careful
(, Tue 14 Feb 2006, 15:58, archived)
# oh come on - some of them were very funny.
Posting 'IM ON FUCKING FIRE' 100's of times is just a bit wanky.
(, Tue 14 Feb 2006, 16:01, archived)
# HES!
not I'm. And I also did it, so did other people. And the banned people have had no email explaining, and no warning. Daft.
(, Tue 14 Feb 2006, 16:05, archived)
# i liked the rik ones and i find most wagons quite funny
some are shit, so what...noone bans the countless tossers who spend all day just being mean and picky.
the people who've been banned are well liked and post alot of good posts, so what if they acted liek tossers for a bit, who hasn't ?
(, Tue 14 Feb 2006, 16:06, archived)
# They do seem to have gone a bit trigger happy lately.
Would just be nice to have an explaination to be honest.
(, Tue 14 Feb 2006, 16:02, archived)