
in some black denim? :)
/me spots a way to get cash for his old jeans that don't fit any more
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:38,
archived)
/me spots a way to get cash for his old jeans that don't fit any more

is a nice bunch of gladioli sticking out the back pocket.
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:40,
archived)

but I've read better - talk about underdeveloping your ideas.
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:39,
archived)

fuckwit :)
*runs away screaming in terror :)*
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:40,
archived)
*runs away screaming in terror :)*

All hail Amerella, for she is succinct and also quite right!
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:40,
archived)

I thought you loved them!
Oh and *smack with a brick* to a retreating Hugo :)
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:47,
archived)
Oh and *smack with a brick* to a retreating Hugo :)

the one about the Grinch stealing christmas, and this year I got Dogger.
And? ;)
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:57,
archived)
And? ;)

but I was increasingly disappointed as it went on.
1st book: beautiful - well-realised, well-structured, properly engrossing and complex.
2nd book: er, all right I s'pose
3rd book: a mixture of the amazing, brilliant relationship between Lyra and Will, and the UTTER UTTER crap of all those personality reversions, weird and unlikely planets, and the fucking PIXIES - they weren't called Pixies but Pixies is what they were. I wanted to kill him when I finished that book - it was 99% shite and 1% really really good.
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:55,
archived)
1st book: beautiful - well-realised, well-structured, properly engrossing and complex.
2nd book: er, all right I s'pose
3rd book: a mixture of the amazing, brilliant relationship between Lyra and Will, and the UTTER UTTER crap of all those personality reversions, weird and unlikely planets, and the fucking PIXIES - they weren't called Pixies but Pixies is what they were. I wanted to kill him when I finished that book - it was 99% shite and 1% really really good.

although admitedly as the last in a trilogy itstands les well on its own as a single work
all the physics stuff was right up my street.
i liked the fact that the characters all had both flaws and good points, rather than in other young peoples fiction where the baddies/goodies divide is black and white.
It was just that some of the books (of the trilogy) highlighted the flaws of some caracters more and others highlighted there better points.
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 13:03,
archived)
all the physics stuff was right up my street.
i liked the fact that the characters all had both flaws and good points, rather than in other young peoples fiction where the baddies/goodies divide is black and white.
It was just that some of the books (of the trilogy) highlighted the flaws of some caracters more and others highlighted there better points.

was that they were in a trilogy and I had to wait to get the next book to carry on ;-)
For what are supposed to be early teens books, they are very thought provoking and moving. The whole idea of daemons was incredibly touching. And speaking as someone who went to a religous state school and then lapsed I think the idea of allowing kids to question their faith should be applauded, not feared...
How people can say they have real faith but have ever really questioned it amazes me
( ,
Mon 6 Jan 2003, 12:48,
archived)
For what are supposed to be early teens books, they are very thought provoking and moving. The whole idea of daemons was incredibly touching. And speaking as someone who went to a religous state school and then lapsed I think the idea of allowing kids to question their faith should be applauded, not feared...
How people can say they have real faith but have ever really questioned it amazes me