looks good, loads ok, is only wee.
what's the deal with png's?
in two words or less.
( ,
Tue 21 Nov 2006, 16:46,
archived)
in two words or less.
guess i'm dumber than i thought.
i understand it's an alternative
but can i have an easier two? or is that all there is to it?
i really know nothing about this sort of thing.
( ,
Tue 21 Nov 2006, 16:50,
archived)
but can i have an easier two? or is that all there is to it?
i really know nothing about this sort of thing.
only a ghey 8-bit one though ZLOLZ
except -24s which don't work
( ,
Tue 21 Nov 2006, 16:56,
archived)
you've all lost me now.
it was going so well.
i'll stick to what i know very,very little about rather than changing to something about which i know nothing.
point and shoot and don't ask questions.
( ,
Tue 21 Nov 2006, 17:00,
archived)
i'll stick to what i know very,very little about rather than changing to something about which i know nothing.
point and shoot and don't ask questions.
Right
It goes onto the internet well and is a small filesize but looks as good as a bitmap or something big like that.
Simple enough?
( ,
Tue 21 Nov 2006, 17:01,
archived)
Simple enough?
yes.
so there really is no issue with them then.
hooray.
sorry for my general stupidity.
( ,
Tue 21 Nov 2006, 17:05,
archived)
hooray.
sorry for my general stupidity.
S'alright, I thought I was shit
But you made me feel quite like an IT person.
( ,
Tue 21 Nov 2006, 17:06,
archived)