b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 7080282 (Thread)

# but how do you know what he said
when he said it 2000 years ago?
Journalists today can't get a quote right that was spoken yesterday?

Plus his words were first documented some 400 years after saying them according to most scholars dating of Bible number 1.
(, Thu 12 Apr 2007, 16:28, archived)
# True
but as I'm not hurting anyone, I'll believe whatever I like.
(, Thu 12 Apr 2007, 16:32, archived)
# thats fine and dandy and the best approach
(, Thu 12 Apr 2007, 16:36, archived)
# ^ FAG ENABLER!!!! ^
BURN IN HELL!!

:D

/LT
(, Thu 12 Apr 2007, 16:33, archived)
# The message is as it is.
You either agree with it or don't.

Unless you're saying that you do believe in Jesus and that he was the son of God, then obviously the authenticity of what's in the Bible is a lot more important.
(, Thu 12 Apr 2007, 16:33, archived)
# although the bible was collated and published as ONE work
400 years after the events, the books and letters themselves were in wide circulation well before then. The old testament infact, was copied and copied for thousands of years and nothing was changed between them.
(, Thu 12 Apr 2007, 16:37, archived)
# are you sure?
isn't the da vinci code based on one error a monk made whilst translating the book in the 1500s?
(, Thu 12 Apr 2007, 16:43, archived)
# isn't the da vinci code a work of fiction?
(, Thu 12 Apr 2007, 16:52, archived)