After reading the below article:
http://www.kangguru.org/images/dwarf.jpg
i got an idea:
it's quite odd, but it's TRUE! the newspaper says so. the dwarf looked better before recolouration, but such is the price of progress.
does this all work?
thanks SOOO much to Munkt0n for the hosting and stuff. cheers muchly mate.
I'm off to bed everyone. its 12:25am. g'night!
( ,
Thu 23 Jan 2003, 11:26,
archived)
http://www.kangguru.org/images/dwarf.jpg
i got an idea:
it's quite odd, but it's TRUE! the newspaper says so. the dwarf looked better before recolouration, but such is the price of progress.
does this all work?
thanks SOOO much to Munkt0n for the hosting and stuff. cheers muchly mate.
I'm off to bed everyone. its 12:25am. g'night!
nope
ill take 'articles' like that with a pinch of salt on this photoshop haven...!
( ,
Thu 23 Jan 2003, 11:29,
archived)
i agree
but it is PAINFULLY hard to finid good picture's of dwarfs on google. why do you think i'm always using lawn gnomes instead?
maybe thats why...
/one.... last.... refresh........
( ,
Thu 23 Jan 2003, 11:34,
archived)
maybe thats why...
/one.... last.... refresh........