I don't know.
but then I don't understand the appeal of women in pink underwear. In fact, if I got one back to mine and she had pink knicks on I think I'd turf her on principle.
That, and anything to do with playboy (as in the pink merchandise, not Lord Heff. He can live.)
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:09,
archived)
That, and anything to do with playboy (as in the pink merchandise, not Lord Heff. He can live.)
Not my cuppa but as long as they both get off on it then I'm happy for them.
I've taken part in some more strange sexual practices in my time, there's nothing wrong with a bit of....well, wrong.
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:12,
archived)
Seconded.
But probably not discussion for an open forum.
What am I saying?
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:14,
archived)
What am I saying?
I have no idea.
I have no shame. I'm trying to teach myself it but I just don't see sex as a taboo subject.
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:22,
archived)
Neither do I.
I'm happy for people to indulge in whatever sexual fetish they want to as long as they don't force me to do anything too unpleasant ;)
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:23,
archived)
Exactly.
And as long as they're not raping/having sex with kiddies. Wouldn't like people to do that really, kiddies need their innocent times.
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:25,
archived)
Indeed.
This conversation is running to a half rapidly, considering the subject.
Bumming. Let's discuss bumming.
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:29,
archived)
Bumming. Let's discuss bumming.
Compared to her
I look like chewed gum. She has no need to worry.
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:42,
archived)
you both went quiet on teh board
i thought you were off canoodling!
;)
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:44,
archived)
;)
I don't think I'd be able to reach him to give him a canoodle, even if I wanted to!
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:50,
archived)
I'll be installing it tonight duckie
I shall gaz thee my email
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:41,
archived)
I still feel weird when someone calls me a woman.
I am one, don't worry, it's just.... I don't know. I think I'm still expecting to be a girl.
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:13,
archived)
Pfft.
If I'm a boy, my tits are even better than they were 5 mins ago.
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:18,
archived)
Did you ask?
I've got one other to add, now you mention it. Whoops.
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:22,
archived)
*CTRL V's *
CREATE VIEW dbo.tmpvwSOPCreditNoteOrderDate
AS
SELECT dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.Period, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.SKU, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.Volume, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.CreditNoteReference,
dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.OrderLine, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.OriginalReference, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.AccountNumber,
dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.Sequence, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.Stockroom, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.ReasonCode, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.NetPrice,
dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.GSV, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.GSV - dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.Duty - dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.DiscountTerms AS NSV,
dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.InvoiceDate, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.DiscountTerms, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.DiscountTPR,
dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.DiscountOther, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.Duty, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.CostOfSales, dbo.tmpSOP_Invoice.OrderDate,
dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.DiscountEDLP, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.PCNMkt, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.PCNSales,
dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.Distribution
FROM dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote INNER JOIN
dbo.tmpSOP_Invoice ON dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.OriginalReference = dbo.tmpSOP_Invoice.InvoiceReference
-------------
I was pulling ya leg son!
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:21,
archived)
AS
SELECT dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.Period, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.SKU, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.Volume, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.CreditNoteReference,
dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.OrderLine, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.OriginalReference, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.AccountNumber,
dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.Sequence, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.Stockroom, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.ReasonCode, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.NetPrice,
dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.GSV, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.GSV - dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.Duty - dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.DiscountTerms AS NSV,
dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.InvoiceDate, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.DiscountTerms, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.DiscountTPR,
dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.DiscountOther, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.Duty, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.CostOfSales, dbo.tmpSOP_Invoice.OrderDate,
dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.DiscountEDLP, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.PCNMkt, dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.PCNSales,
dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.Distribution
FROM dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote INNER JOIN
dbo.tmpSOP_Invoice ON dbo.tmpSOP_CreditNote.OriginalReference = dbo.tmpSOP_Invoice.InvoiceReference
-------------
I was pulling ya leg son!
That looks like a well boring job.
I shall c+p something worky from here.
If you reduce your salary by more than £243 per month, the
additional amount will come from your net pay after tax and
National Insurance contributions have been paid, so there are
no extra savings, but you do have the convenience of being
able to pay your carer from a single account. What’s more,
the savings are per employee. So if your partner works for the
same employer – or another company that offers a childcare
payment scheme – your family could benefit twice.
That's just as boring, isn't it?
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:24,
archived)
If you reduce your salary by more than £243 per month, the
additional amount will come from your net pay after tax and
National Insurance contributions have been paid, so there are
no extra savings, but you do have the convenience of being
able to pay your carer from a single account. What’s more,
the savings are per employee. So if your partner works for the
same employer – or another company that offers a childcare
payment scheme – your family could benefit twice.
That's just as boring, isn't it?
shh this is top secret
126 84 50 69
126 84 50 69
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
6% 4% 6% 17%
15% 32% 38% 61%
466 813 484 483
440 810 483 481
94.42% 99.63% 99.79% 99.59%
18% 32% 30% 29%
57% 62% 68% 62%
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:29,
archived)
126 84 50 69
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
6% 4% 6% 17%
15% 32% 38% 61%
466 813 484 483
440 810 483 481
94.42% 99.63% 99.79% 99.59%
18% 32% 30% 29%
57% 62% 68% 62%
and mine
// Occasionally bid and ask values of 9999.99 and 9999.98 are sent on these feeds. These represent
// the ‘at best’ and ‘at open’ orders respectively. This bid and ask information comes from Euronext for
// Paris and Brussels stocks when there is an 'At Best' or an 'At Opening' order placed on the order book,
// usually during the pre-market phase. The exchange sends these orders to us, not as numerical values,
// but as 'MX' or 'OUV' respectively. The bid and ask fields can transmit numerical data only, consequently
// the letters 'MX' or 'OUV' must be represented in a new numerical format. When a bid or ask is received
// which is 'At Best' (MX), a price value of 9999.99 is transmitted to indicate this state. To represent an 'At
// Opening' (OUV) order, a bid or ask of the value 9999.98 is transmitted. Additionally, an “invalidated price”
// will return a value of 9999.97. Customers are advised to adapt their displays at their discretion to portray
// these states to end users.
:/
( ,
Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:45,
archived)
// the ‘at best’ and ‘at open’ orders respectively. This bid and ask information comes from Euronext for
// Paris and Brussels stocks when there is an 'At Best' or an 'At Opening' order placed on the order book,
// usually during the pre-market phase. The exchange sends these orders to us, not as numerical values,
// but as 'MX' or 'OUV' respectively. The bid and ask fields can transmit numerical data only, consequently
// the letters 'MX' or 'OUV' must be represented in a new numerical format. When a bid or ask is received
// which is 'At Best' (MX), a price value of 9999.99 is transmitted to indicate this state. To represent an 'At
// Opening' (OUV) order, a bid or ask of the value 9999.98 is transmitted. Additionally, an “invalidated price”
// will return a value of 9999.97. Customers are advised to adapt their displays at their discretion to portray
// these states to end users.
:/