
now the only place you can smoke is at home, with your kids, and their soft absorbent lungs :(
( ,
Tue 8 May 2007, 16:24,
archived)

if you don't want to breathe smoke don't got to a pub
'oh but i work in a pub, and i don't smoke'
GO WORK IN MACDONALDS
( ,
Tue 8 May 2007, 16:29,
archived)
'oh but i work in a pub, and i don't smoke'
GO WORK IN MACDONALDS

i don't smoke, i hate the smell of cigarettes
BUT smoking is not a crime
( ,
Tue 8 May 2007, 16:31,
archived)
BUT smoking is not a crime

don't go to a pub (after 1st July of course).
Seriously, that is the shitest arguament against the ban. Me going into a pub and not smoking doesn't really affect anyone (unless I haven't had a bath for a while) but someone smoking in the same room as me makes me smell and gives me face aids.
Forest talk utter shite.
( ,
Tue 8 May 2007, 16:59,
archived)
Seriously, that is the shitest arguament against the ban. Me going into a pub and not smoking doesn't really affect anyone (unless I haven't had a bath for a while) but someone smoking in the same room as me makes me smell and gives me face aids.
Forest talk utter shite.

so do the anti-smoking fanatics.
as far as I can see the agreed facts by actual real life people I've met are:
1) some people like it and want to do it
2) some people think it smells awful and it annoys them.
3) you can't get the smell out of your clothes/eyes/hair easily
4) it's not particularly healthy
so yes, people shouldn't have it inflicted on them needlessly. Nor should people be denied the option to do it, but there's no defence against the perfectly reasonable request to go outside while you do it. Or to a special room or something, with suitable ventilation.
( ,
Tue 8 May 2007, 17:05,
archived)
as far as I can see the agreed facts by actual real life people I've met are:
1) some people like it and want to do it
2) some people think it smells awful and it annoys them.
3) you can't get the smell out of your clothes/eyes/hair easily
4) it's not particularly healthy
so yes, people shouldn't have it inflicted on them needlessly. Nor should people be denied the option to do it, but there's no defence against the perfectly reasonable request to go outside while you do it. Or to a special room or something, with suitable ventilation.

I have no problem if people want to smoke (although I still think that it is obviously not the best thing to do) but the arguament that I shouldn't go to a pub if I don't want breathe it in a smell of it really pisses me off.
Surely the arguament should be the other way around.
Anyway the smokers can moan all they like, they will still be freezing their arses off outside come November.
( ,
Tue 8 May 2007, 17:13,
archived)
Surely the arguament should be the other way around.
Anyway the smokers can moan all they like, they will still be freezing their arses off outside come November.

when have pubs ever been a refuge of the fit and healthy??
if you don't like a smokey pub
fucking Drink at home
( ,
Tue 8 May 2007, 16:29,
archived)
if you don't like a smokey pub
fucking Drink at home

and I will say it again.
Anybody who cares so little about their children that they are willing to smoke in front of them does not need a smoking ban as encouragement.
The smoking ban in Scotland has not stopped anybody from smoking when they go to the pub - they just go outside for 5 minutes whenever they want a cigarette.
( ,
Tue 8 May 2007, 16:33,
archived)
Anybody who cares so little about their children that they are willing to smoke in front of them does not need a smoking ban as encouragement.
The smoking ban in Scotland has not stopped anybody from smoking when they go to the pub - they just go outside for 5 minutes whenever they want a cigarette.