b3ta.com board

Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 7186799 (Thread)

your original post there...

had no direct replies telling you off.

It did contain a bit of discussion but nobody actually had a go at you for posting it.

I think this is because you were having a go at the campaign, not the girl and because it was executed with some degree of wit and talent.

So why do you assume everyone who has a problem with the crap unfunny posts on the topic is referring to you?

Edit: typos

(

Mockingbird Practitioner of SCIENCE, Mon 14 May 2007, 16:57, archived)

mockingbird is right again.

I think the only crass one I've seen is the wordmash of the BBC News site this morning.

(

Barbarossa is not my real name, Mon 14 May 2007, 17:01, archived)

again?

I remember in the mid 80's saying wham were "a bit gay".

Was that the other time?

(

Mockingbird Practitioner of SCIENCE, Mon 14 May 2007, 17:19, archived)

^ This

Your's was the right side of the line. If all the donators really cared they would do it anonymously (not spelt right prob). :)

(

op op op op op I stink therfore I spam, Mon 14 May 2007, 17:02, archived)

because I'm deeply insecure? :D

I only came onto b3ta to post that (so didn't see the earlier ones), and I do like to get feedback. Thanks for clarification.

(Baron Samedi - sale must end, Mon 14 May 2007, 17:04, archived)

it WAS quite good.

I wasn't on when you posted it, I had to go back and look.

I'd like to get my moral outrage on about the quality of parenting/actions of newspapers/appropriateness of this much media focus but I feel to uninformed to do so.

</insecurity blog>

(

Mockingbird Practitioner of SCIENCE, Mon 14 May 2007, 17:16, archived)