b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 7235257 (Thread)

# More creationist nonsense
(, Tue 29 May 2007, 19:50, archived)
# Well of course
Those razor-sharp fangs were for use against the really aggressive vegetables.

(, Tue 29 May 2007, 19:56, archived)
# no they only evolved them after the fall of man
no wait...
fuck
(, Tue 29 May 2007, 19:56, archived)
# Ugh
They had to sign contracts? What if you broke your contract and suddenly realized creationism is shite?

Woo-ful shop.
(, Tue 29 May 2007, 19:58, archived)
# interesting story
i'm glad i don't teach science in the USA
(and i imagine a lot of you out there are glad you don't teach science here in the UK...)
(, Tue 29 May 2007, 19:58, archived)
# my science book had a whole chapter on the scientific theories of how life started
like, the amino acids from comets, the bubbles of fats that turned into a cell membrane after, the Miller-Urey experiment. Then at the end it mentions how none of these are proven and that there could be a cause they haven't thought of. Then it mentions creationism and how that is what some people believe. It wasn't even that tag that they put on the books in Kansas, but it still made me feel sad.
(, Tue 29 May 2007, 20:03, archived)
# unfortunately it's still like that today
whenever i have to teach any of this stuff it's always recommended to put some sort of disclaimer such as this.

a recent lesson i taught about carbon dating was titled "Is the Turin Shroud a fake?". I heard a sharp intake of breath from the more religious in the group.
(, Tue 29 May 2007, 20:07, archived)
# but it is a fake.
I thought the church decided on that finally. Anyways, that is pretty interesting. In my school even the most devout girl (she was DEVOUT I tell you. Said grace in the cafeteria, was nice to people) knew that you aren't supposed to show that you have a stance in religion when it comes to teaching in a public school.
(, Tue 29 May 2007, 20:11, archived)
# wasn't there some tv programme a while ago claiming it was a medieval attempt at photography?
that would be cool

but also very sad if true, if that's the only photo that got made until several hundred years later
(, Tue 29 May 2007, 21:24, archived)
# Bill Hicks
did ask the very reasonable question - "why do creationists seem so unevolved"?

Did he ever get an answer?
(, Tue 29 May 2007, 20:02, archived)
# A response in the form of
eternal damnation, but I don't know if that qualifies as an answer.
(, Tue 29 May 2007, 20:04, archived)
# Well
it does seem a touch dogmatic
(, Tue 29 May 2007, 20:11, archived)
# I never understand how fundementalists function properly in a modern society.
My church's priests knew that the Bible wasn't entirely factual to the very letter, and made sure that they taught the lessons the Bible was trying to teach, not how if you are a leper you should always thank Jesus. And they were Catholic. Religion is so boggling.
(, Tue 29 May 2007, 20:13, archived)
# That museum is a nonsense!
(, Tue 29 May 2007, 20:09, archived)