b3ta.com board

Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 7305946 (Thread)

Ta, one is the best.

(Mr Ree AnthRopoMorphiC, Mon 18 Jun 2007, 2:06, archived)

I agree it is very nice.....Reading what you put above........

Explaining how you did it... you tried starting from scratch without a source picture.???

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Mon 18 Jun 2007, 2:15, archived)

No silly, I've linked the sauce pic up there.

(Mr Ree AnthRopoMorphiC, Mon 18 Jun 2007, 2:25, archived)

Yes I saw it and looked......

Was just wondering why you don't start from scratch...??... you obviously know your way around photoshop well enough and have the talent to be able to do so .......I posted the pic above to show you can get similar results from starting from scratch and just wondered why you didn't just creat your own starting pictures before you started to manipulate them...???

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Mon 18 Jun 2007, 2:39, archived)

Interesting point..I have no idea.

Lazy I guess.

Also, the photos I choose have an organic/metallic/? quality that inspires me.

(They're not that similar)
;D

(Mr Ree AnthRopoMorphiC, Mon 18 Jun 2007, 2:44, archived)

it's nice when

you can see bits of what might have been structure (ie: original image) in what looks at first like a picture made from scratch.

that's maybe why 1 is better than 2 or 3. 2 is too complex (too much of the original), while 3 is too simple (no obvious hidden structure).

1 is goldilocks.

(

The Alchemist king of the needlessly complicated, Mon 18 Jun 2007, 2:48, archived)

Hmm..

I wouldn't say 2 is too complex, and I wouldn't say 3 is too simple. All three are emulating different styles.

Thing is, if i hadn't linked the source pic it would be hard to make the comparison, nes pa?

(Mr Ree AnthRopoMorphiC, Mon 18 Jun 2007, 2:53, archived)