
the first one looks like something froom Rollcage, what a fricking awesome game that was
( ,
Mon 18 Jun 2007, 1:47,
archived)

Ed: Oh right, it's like F-Zero,..ahaha, fair enough.
( ,
Mon 18 Jun 2007, 1:48,
archived)

morph an original photo or start from scratch?
( ,
Mon 18 Jun 2007, 1:51,
archived)

They're quite labour intensive, here's the sauce;
www.isra.org/drawing_a_bead/mi24-hind-helicopter.jpg
I just mess with them randomly and see what happens. I also use MSPhotoEd to smooth or sharpen pixels.
( ,
Mon 18 Jun 2007, 1:53,
archived)
www.isra.org/drawing_a_bead/mi24-hind-helicopter.jpg
I just mess with them randomly and see what happens. I also use MSPhotoEd to smooth or sharpen pixels.

impressive, they look like robots
( ,
Mon 18 Jun 2007, 1:59,
archived)

Just,.ermm..expand, twirl, mess with the colours, I dunno,..I don't really think while I do them.
Robots rule.
Also, image 2 is a progression of 1, and 3 is a progression of 2.
( ,
Mon 18 Jun 2007, 2:01,
archived)
Robots rule.
Also, image 2 is a progression of 1, and 3 is a progression of 2.

1 is the first 2 is the second and 3 is the third *obviously..!!* but in order of my liking that is......mmmmmmm*I'm pissed and that doesn't make sense*......1 is the most woosome.....but I like all 3....
( ,
Mon 18 Jun 2007, 1:58,
archived)

Explaining how you did it... you tried starting from scratch without a source picture.???

( ,
Mon 18 Jun 2007, 2:15,
archived)


Was just wondering why you don't start from scratch...??... you obviously know your way around photoshop well enough and have the talent to be able to do so .......I posted the pic above to show you can get similar results from starting from scratch and just wondered why you didn't just creat your own starting pictures before you started to manipulate them...???
( ,
Mon 18 Jun 2007, 2:39,
archived)

Lazy I guess.
Also, the photos I choose have an organic/metallic/? quality that inspires me.
(They're not that similar)
;D
( ,
Mon 18 Jun 2007, 2:44,
archived)
Also, the photos I choose have an organic/metallic/? quality that inspires me.
(They're not that similar)
;D

you can see bits of what might have been structure (ie: original image) in what looks at first like a picture made from scratch.
that's maybe why 1 is better than 2 or 3. 2 is too complex (too much of the original), while 3 is too simple (no obvious hidden structure).
1 is goldilocks.
( ,
Mon 18 Jun 2007, 2:48,
archived)
that's maybe why 1 is better than 2 or 3. 2 is too complex (too much of the original), while 3 is too simple (no obvious hidden structure).
1 is goldilocks.