Neither
It's a vector. Tracing with lines that have
various points that are connected by
mathematically calculated curves that can be
infinitely scaled up without loss of detail.
( ,
Fri 6 Jul 2007, 1:43,
archived)
various points that are connected by
mathematically calculated curves that can be
infinitely scaled up without loss of detail.
ahh,
wondered why it lacked curves. Vectoring might save you time..
( ,
Fri 6 Jul 2007, 1:46,
archived)
yeah it would save hours
but then is it really art if you let a computer do all the work for you?
( ,
Fri 6 Jul 2007, 1:51,
archived)
oh, come now!
that's like using a paintbrush the wrong way
round to make the painting more impressive!
I would guess it would take at least 2 hours to
vector that.....hardly effortless.
I think your image benefits from lack of vector tho. it certainly gives it a different style.
( ,
Fri 6 Jul 2007, 1:57,
archived)
round to make the painting more impressive!
I would guess it would take at least 2 hours to
vector that.....hardly effortless.
I think your image benefits from lack of vector tho. it certainly gives it a different style.
I once got dumped wit the line:
"Sorry, I can't handle your massive style"
...never did find out what that meant.
( ,
Fri 6 Jul 2007, 2:06,
archived)
...never did find out what that meant.
So
for it to be a proper vector drawing all these bastard lines need to be curves?
( ,
Fri 6 Jul 2007, 2:06,
archived)
think there are programs out there that do it all mathimatically for you
but then you don't get to put your own style into it. Call it what you will, I call it "a picture wot I done"
( ,
Fri 6 Jul 2007, 2:08,
archived)
Yeah I know you do
But I'm saying there are programs out there that do it for you, like filters only more curvyness and math like stuff
( ,
Fri 6 Jul 2007, 2:13,
archived)