Not seen any of those
No programme could make me look good naked
( ,
Tue 10 Jul 2007, 11:33,
archived)
Course it can!
Bet you do anyway.
I'm a big chubpot, and I bet I don't look that bad naked. Just a bit widescreen.
( ,
Tue 10 Jul 2007, 11:35,
archived)
I'm a big chubpot, and I bet I don't look that bad naked. Just a bit widescreen.
I'm fat, hairy and have dull but ugly scars
and I look good naked*
*compared to steve chegwin
( ,
Tue 10 Jul 2007, 11:37,
archived)
*compared to steve chegwin
We should compare arse sizes
Bet I'd be more widescreen than you
( ,
Tue 10 Jul 2007, 11:37,
archived)
As a scientist
I am willing to be the independent judge of such a comparison.
Please can all entrants send a photo of their arse in the following positions:
1) Stood up with a normal sheet of A4 paper held alongside (for scale) - try to keep it in the same plane as your hip sockets.
2) sat on a copy of today's daily telegraph on a hard wooden surface.
Cladding is up to the entrant, but no salopets.
( ,
Tue 10 Jul 2007, 11:41,
archived)
Please can all entrants send a photo of their arse in the following positions:
1) Stood up with a normal sheet of A4 paper held alongside (for scale) - try to keep it in the same plane as your hip sockets.
2) sat on a copy of today's daily telegraph on a hard wooden surface.
Cladding is up to the entrant, but no salopets.
I will act as the independant arbitration panel
ensuring mockingbird's ruling is fair and true.
( ,
Tue 10 Jul 2007, 11:43,
archived)