So I am told
and it really must be a bitch having a legitimate condition the symptoms of which are largely indistinguishable from being a bit thick.
Nonetheless, it was an observation not a judgement.
*smugs*
( ,
Thu 19 Jul 2007, 13:36,
archived)
Nonetheless, it was an observation not a judgement.
*smugs*
Your profile is not safe for work.
If my collegues were looking, they might think that I am a perve.
Can you please remove the picture, or mark your profile as NSFW.
( ,
Thu 19 Jul 2007, 13:37,
archived)
Can you please remove the picture, or mark your profile as NSFW.
and you clicked it - why?
In other news: www.b3ta.com/board/7420807
( ,
Thu 19 Jul 2007, 13:39,
archived)
Actually dyslexics are more likely to have a higher IQ than someone of the same demographic.
( ,
Thu 19 Jul 2007, 13:40,
archived)
is that actually because dyslexics are, on average, cleverer
or because dyslexia may be missed in someone who is also stupid?
( ,
Thu 19 Jul 2007, 13:42,
archived)
Arf!
Good point. Perhaps stupid dyslexics never get diagnosed because either:
a) they're too stupid to spell properly even without the dyslexia
or
b) They're too stupid to spell properly but also dyslexic so it cancels out to reasonable spelling ability.
( ,
Thu 19 Jul 2007, 13:44,
archived)
a) they're too stupid to spell properly even without the dyslexia
or
b) They're too stupid to spell properly but also dyslexic so it cancels out to reasonable spelling ability.