It's not double standards if that comment isn't current
It is in response to my being told I was wrong before that I considered this ok.
Silly me for listening to people.
Of bollocks I've done it again here!
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 20:47,
archived)
Silly me for listening to people.
Of bollocks I've done it again here!
pffft
yes, I see what you mean. Ok, it's not double standards, it's a u-turn.
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 20:50,
archived)
yeah but on the other hand
you've been a pretty big file size nazi in the past. so, going by your current justification that standards evolve, does that mean that file sizes creeping up are now acceptable?
i'm all for pushing boundaries, but, i dunno, i guess i didnt expect something so obviously dodgy from you.
just my 2p worth.
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 20:52,
archived)
i'm all for pushing boundaries, but, i dunno, i guess i didnt expect something so obviously dodgy from you.
just my 2p worth.
yes
which is why as you say "in the past" I commented on them but now just offer artistic advise.
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 20:55,
archived)
Seriously Vino
what's up with you? why are you trawling my history trying to catch me out on things?
Both of those images (if memory serves) were a long way over the limits. The first possibly being an 800k anim.
I didn't pointlessly swear, I was polite and to the point and more over had a nice chat with the guy I awarded my friendship badge to.
I even helped out by providing an board friendly, optimised version.
What is it I have done to offend you so utterly deeply? And why are you angry toward me helping out here and there?
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 21:31,
archived)
Both of those images (if memory serves) were a long way over the limits. The first possibly being an 800k anim.
I didn't pointlessly swear, I was polite and to the point and more over had a nice chat with the guy I awarded my friendship badge to.
I even helped out by providing an board friendly, optimised version.
What is it I have done to offend you so utterly deeply? And why are you angry toward me helping out here and there?
no, this is far more deep rooted seeming
Oh, and how come you're not complaining equally hard about the picture of a lady garden further up the board?
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 21:43,
archived)
oh
well its mildly nsfw but its not a giant vagina on legs/arse on legs...
anyways... back to the top of the board
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 21:59,
archived)
anyways... back to the top of the board
You have always ALWAYS been a bit of a nazi
and, hey, I'm OK with that. You can be quite harsh at times, but as long as you stick to your own high standards I can't fault it.
But with this post? You've posted something that you yourself would have pounced upon and "corrected" the poster about.
Either you've had a complete change of heart or you're trying to prove some sort of point.
I don't believe the first and I don't like the second.
You're not an inexperienced or immature poster, so you should know that some people would find that picture NSFW and yet you didn't post it as a link.
Then you've been all "who me? But I'm only agreeing with you all!" about it.
It made me angry. You know better. You've proved you know better by telling others.
You seem to have caught me on a bad day and for that I apologise. Maybe Oxfordshire disagrees with my normally sweet temperament.
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 21:47,
archived)
But with this post? You've posted something that you yourself would have pounced upon and "corrected" the poster about.
Either you've had a complete change of heart or you're trying to prove some sort of point.
I don't believe the first and I don't like the second.
You're not an inexperienced or immature poster, so you should know that some people would find that picture NSFW and yet you didn't post it as a link.
Then you've been all "who me? But I'm only agreeing with you all!" about it.
It made me angry. You know better. You've proved you know better by telling others.
You seem to have caught me on a bad day and for that I apologise. Maybe Oxfordshire disagrees with my normally sweet temperament.