
/I love Aliens immensely, but Alien just edges it for me on direction.
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:12,
archived)

if i'd watched it when it first came out, i would probably appreciate Alien more but, as it stands, i think Aliens is much better.
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:14,
archived)

and it's supported by one of the most awesome casts of it's time.
Aliens did feel close and chilling in places, but went from small to big set pieces very quickly
(in my humble opinion anyway)
The extended version MORE than makes up for this fleeting direction though,
and makes for a much better film
(as indeed does the longer, uncut version of Alien 3, which introduces so much more, and is a cracking uncut film)
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:17,
archived)
Aliens did feel close and chilling in places, but went from small to big set pieces very quickly
(in my humble opinion anyway)
The extended version MORE than makes up for this fleeting direction though,
and makes for a much better film
(as indeed does the longer, uncut version of Alien 3, which introduces so much more, and is a cracking uncut film)

Verily, you speak the truth.
The uncut version of 3 is good, is it?
*heads off to Play.com*
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:20,
archived)
The uncut version of 3 is good, is it?
*heads off to Play.com*

and a nice twist which plays back to Finchers original idea as to where the Alien comes from.
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:21,
archived)

It'll be here tomorrow!
Thank god for express shipping!
Edit: Damn! Next week. :(
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:24,
archived)
Thank god for express shipping!
Edit: Damn! Next week. :(

as above, so out with the dog idea and back to the bovine, also there is a reference to it in the original cinema version, of the waste holding container that they want to burn the alien down from the pipes and capture it, but it was never in the film, is now back in there :D
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:54,
archived)

loved them. i'm a fan of Alien 3 as well, purely because i like the concept of going from a well-armoured, well-trained fighting unit to a colony of weapon-free religious zealots, yet having to face the same enemy.
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:22,
archived)

even though I'm the 'Aliens' generation (30) i still prefer the first, primarily for its cast and feel
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:23,
archived)

but, apart from that, it just didn't do it for me. i like more action and blowing stuff up ;)
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:27,
archived)

But the first one was a corker.
Mind you, I thought the *look* of the 3rd one was very good also.
Bit of a Fincher fan.
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:15,
archived)
Mind you, I thought the *look* of the 3rd one was very good also.
Bit of a Fincher fan.

loved that version. shows the cinema release up for the cack it truly was. Dreadful editing
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:18,
archived)

Vincent (The Navigator) Ward wrote it?
/failing memory blog
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:22,
archived)
/failing memory blog

this was scrapped in favour of the 'dogburster' but the uncut extended version goes back to the original animal
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:24,
archived)

it's really funny because half the people are apologising for how crap it is and the other half are still really bitter about it after 20 years
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:26,
archived)

[edit]the directors cut is much better. the alien coming out of a cow should have made it a docile herbivore if you follow the gene borrowing logic of the other cut tho.
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:19,
archived)

...if you're in the mood for seeing a load of aliens being shot, it doesn't quite cut it. I think we can all agree that both are better than the travesties which followed!
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:19,
archived)

given they changed the formula again from what had proceeded it, but Resurrection was jaded and sterile in my books, with little that was original. Which is why I'm looking forward to AvP 2, given it's set on earth. Oh and will have an 18 certificate, as someone pointed out above.
( ,
Tue 4 Sep 2007, 16:26,
archived)